Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJackson, Len_NZ
dc.contributor.authorPeters, MAen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBenade, Len_NZ
dc.contributor.authorDevine, Nen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorArndt, Sen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorForster, Den_NZ
dc.contributor.authorGibbons, Aen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorGrierson, Een_NZ
dc.contributor.authorJandrić, Pen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorLazaroiu, Gen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorLocke, Ken_NZ
dc.contributor.authorMihaila, Ren_NZ
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Gen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorTesar, Men_NZ
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Pen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorOzoliņš, JJen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-25T04:07:18Z
dc.date.available2018-06-25T04:07:18Z
dc.date.copyright2018-01en_NZ
dc.identifier.citationOpen Review of Educational Research, 5:1, 95-112, DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139
dc.identifier.issn2326-5507en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/11611
dc.description.abstractPeer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious practice, which can cause distress for both reviewers, and those whose work is reviewed. This paper, produced by the Editors’ Collective, examines the past and future of peer review in academic publishing. The first sections consider how peer review has been defined and practised in changing academic contexts, and its educational significance in the development of scholarship. The paper then explores major historical and contemporary issues around identity, diversity, anonymity, and the review process, and the related power of editors versus reviewers in academic publishing. Finally, the paper discusses the case of new scholars as reviewers engaging in neoliberal labour, before concluding with some brief recommendations based on our analysis.
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139
dc.rights© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectPeer review; Academic publishing; Scholarship; Neoliberalism; Higher education
dc.titleIs peer review in academic publishing still working?en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccessen_NZ
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139en_NZ
aut.relation.endpage112
aut.relation.issue1en_NZ
aut.relation.startpage95
aut.relation.volume5en_NZ
pubs.elements-id339124
aut.relation.journalOpen Review of Educational Researchen_NZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record