Is peer review in academic publishing still working?

Simple item page
aut.relation.endpage112
aut.relation.issue1en_NZ
aut.relation.journalOpen Review of Educational Researchen_NZ
aut.relation.startpage95
aut.relation.volume5en_NZ
aut.researcherStewart, Georgina
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Len_NZ
dc.contributor.authorPeters, MAen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBenade, Len_NZ
dc.contributor.authorDevine, Nen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorArndt, Sen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorForster, Den_NZ
dc.contributor.authorGibbons, Aen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorGrierson, Een_NZ
dc.contributor.authorJandrić, Pen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorLazaroiu, Gen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorLocke, Ken_NZ
dc.contributor.authorMihaila, Ren_NZ
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Gen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorTesar, Men_NZ
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Pen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorOzoliņš, JJen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-25T04:07:18Z
dc.date.available2018-06-25T04:07:18Z
dc.date.copyright2018-01en_NZ
dc.date.issued2018-01en_NZ
dc.description.abstractPeer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious practice, which can cause distress for both reviewers, and those whose work is reviewed. This paper, produced by the Editors’ Collective, examines the past and future of peer review in academic publishing. The first sections consider how peer review has been defined and practised in changing academic contexts, and its educational significance in the development of scholarship. The paper then explores major historical and contemporary issues around identity, diversity, anonymity, and the review process, and the related power of editors versus reviewers in academic publishing. Finally, the paper discusses the case of new scholars as reviewers engaging in neoliberal labour, before concluding with some brief recommendations based on our analysis.
dc.identifier.citationOpen Review of Educational Research, 5:1, 95-112, DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139en_NZ
dc.identifier.issn2326-5507en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10292/11611
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139
dc.rights© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccessen_NZ
dc.subjectPeer review; Academic publishing; Scholarship; Neoliberalism; Higher education
dc.titleIs peer review in academic publishing still working?en_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id339124
pubs.organisational-data/AUT
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Culture & Society
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Culture & Society/Education
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Culture & Society/Education/Higher Education
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Culture & Society/Education/PBRF - review
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/PBRF
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/PBRF/PBRF Culture and Society
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/PBRF/PBRF Culture and Society/Education
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Is peer review in academic publishing still working.pdf
Size:
1.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AUT Grant of Licence for Scholarly Commons Feb2017.pdf
Size:
239.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
School of Education