Defending Science from What?
aut.relation.journal | Educational Philosophy and Theory | en_NZ |
aut.researcher | Stewart, Georgina | |
dc.contributor.author | Stewart, GT | en_NZ |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-16T22:35:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-16T22:35:58Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-01-01 | en_NZ |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-01 | en_NZ |
dc.description.abstract | The seven professors who wrote a letter to the Editor of the New Zealand Listener (Clements et al., 2021) present themselves as ‘defenders’ of science, but how valid, really, is this claim? Three of the authors published an earlier version of the letter, which also used the term ‘defence of science’ in its title (Corballis et al., 2019; May, 2021). This title phrase ‘defence of science’ implies these scholars believe science is under attack; indeed, the main point of both letters is to issue a warning that science is being attacked by Mātauranga Māori, or by those who advance the claims of Mātauranga Māori. The publication of these claims in the Listener has whipped up a media frenzy and heated public debate reminiscent of a ‘moral panic’ (Goode & Ben-Yehuda, 2009). In response, strong disapproval of the letter’s content was expressed in a statement by the Vice-Chancellor of the university where all these professors are either working or emeritus (Freshwater, 2021), and an open letter signed by more than 2,000 academics and others declared that Mātauranga Māori definitely IS science (Sowman-Lund, 2021). This editorial digs below the surface of this rhetoric, to examine what is really going on in this debate, and why it matters. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Educational Philosophy and Theory, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2021.1966415 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00131857.2021.1966415 | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.issn | 0013-1857 | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-5812 | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10292/15624 | |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2021.1966415 | |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2021 Taylor & Francis. Authors retain the right to place his/her pre-publication version of the work on a personal website or institutional repository as an electronic file for personal or professional use, but not for commercial sale or for any systematic external distribution by a third. This is an electronic version of an article published in (see Citation). Educational Philosophy and Theory is available online at: www.tandfonline.com with the open URL of your article (see Publisher’s Version). | |
dc.rights.accessrights | OpenAccess | en_NZ |
dc.title | Defending Science from What? | en_NZ |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
pubs.elements-id | 439257 | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Faculty of Culture & Society | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Faculty of Culture & Society/School of Education | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Faculty of Culture & Society/School of Education/Higher Education | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Faculty of Culture & Society/School of Education/PBRF - review | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF/PBRF Culture and Society | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF/PBRF Culture and Society/Education |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Defending science from what.pdf
- Size:
- 183.64 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Editorial
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- AUT Grant of Licence for Tuwhera Jun 2021.pdf
- Size:
- 360.95 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: