Repository logo
 

Impact of Positive Pressure Ventilation Systems on Indoor Air Quality in Residential Settings

aut.relation.articlenumber113323
aut.relation.endpage113323
aut.relation.journalBuilding and Environment
aut.relation.startpage113323
aut.relation.volume283
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, G
dc.contributor.authorBorge, R
dc.contributor.authorBlanchon, D
dc.contributor.authorBerry, TA
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-20T22:43:58Z
dc.date.available2025-07-20T22:43:58Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-01
dc.description.abstractEffective ventilation is a key requirement in residential buildings to achieve healthy indoor air quality (IAQ) through the introduction of fresh air. Mechanical ventilation (MV) systems are designed to meet IAQ objectives by delivering regular air exchange and dilution of stale air. Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) systems commonly source air from the roof cavity and distribute it throughout the indoor environment. This study evaluated the effects of PPV systems on IAQ in 10 single-family dwellings over a nine-month period across three seasons (winter, spring and summer) and including pre-and post-installation monitoring. Regular measurements of IAQ parameters including PM<inf>2.5</inf> PM<inf>10</inf>, radon, fungal DNA, and heavy metals were collected from bedrooms, living areas, roof spaces and outdoors. Mean indoor concentrations of PM<inf>2.5</inf> and PM<inf>10</inf> each decreased by 44 % following PPV installation. Outdoor levels of PM<inf>2.5</inf> and PM<inf>10</inf> increased over the same period, by 41 % and 37 %, respectively. Reductions in mean indoor concentrations were also observed for radon (53 %) and fungal DNA (64 %). Indoor concentrations of heavy metals also decreased, with chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc decreasing by 28 % on average, while arsenic and cadmium were generally below detection limits. Indoor PM<inf>2.5</inf> concentrations were 31 % higher than roof space concentrations, and weakly correlated (Spearman's coefficient, r<inf>s</inf> = 0.12), suggesting limited influence from the roof cavity. Temperatures in the roof space were 7.1 °C lower, on average, than indoor temperatures. Analysis suggests that a higher temperature differential between roof and indoors is associated with higher levels of energy use, particularly at differentials above 4 °C.
dc.identifier.citationBuilding and Environment, ISSN: 0360-1323 (Print), Elsevier BV, 283, 113323-113323. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113323
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113323
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/19578
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325008029
dc.rights© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject33 Built Environment and Design
dc.subject0502 Environmental Science and Management
dc.subject1201 Architecture
dc.subject1202 Building
dc.subjectBuilding & Construction
dc.subject33 Built environment and design
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.titleImpact of Positive Pressure Ventilation Systems on Indoor Air Quality in Residential Settings
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id618110

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Impact of positive pressure ventilation systems on indoor air quality in residential settings.pdf
Size:
4.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article