Repository logo
 

Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing of Ti6Al4V Alloy Lattice Structures: Orientation-Dependent Fatigue Strength and Crack Growth Behaviour Under Compressive Cyclic Loading

aut.relation.articlenumber107201
aut.relation.journalJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
aut.relation.startpage107201
aut.relation.volume173
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yawen
dc.contributor.authorChen, ZW
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T22:28:51Z
dc.date.available2025-10-01T22:28:51Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-15
dc.description.abstractSufficiently high fatigue strength is required for lattices made using electron beam powder bed fusion (EBPBF) for hip implants and understanding the anisotropic fatigue behaviour of EBPBF lattices is necessary for implant design. In this work, the combined effects of loading direction (LD) and cell orientation of EBPBF-Ti6Al4V lattices on the fatigue strength of the structures under cyclic compressive loading have been studied. Simple cubic (SC) ([001]//LD, [011]//LD and [111]//LD) lattices with a relative density of 0.36 were EBPBF made, tested and examined. The fatigue strength of [001]//LD lattices has been determined to be ∼190 MPa at 5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles, ∼8 times higher than that of [011]//LD or [111]//LD lattices. The low fatigue strength of the non-[001]//LD lattices resulted from crack initiation readily occurring in the high tension locations, which are the top and bottom locations of each unit cell. Sideway growth of cracks leading to fracturing along (001) will be shown. This failure mechanism is absent in [001]//LD lattices and thus their fatigue strength is high. Examining the data in the literature has shown that fatigue strength values of all non-SC lattice structures are low, likely due to the same failure mechanism identified for non-[001]//LD SC lattices in this study.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, ISSN: 1751-6161 (Print); 1878-0180 (Online), Elsevier BV, 173, 107201-. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107201
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107201
dc.identifier.issn1751-6161
dc.identifier.issn1878-0180
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/19898
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125003170
dc.rights© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCell orientation
dc.subjectCrack growth
dc.subjectCrack initiation
dc.subjectStress concentration
dc.subject4014 Manufacturing Engineering
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject0903 Biomedical Engineering
dc.subject0912 Materials Engineering
dc.subject0913 Mechanical Engineering
dc.subjectBiomedical Engineering
dc.subject4003 Biomedical engineering
dc.subject4016 Materials engineering
dc.subject4017 Mechanical engineering
dc.titleElectron Beam Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing of Ti6Al4V Alloy Lattice Structures: Orientation-Dependent Fatigue Strength and Crack Growth Behaviour Under Compressive Cyclic Loading
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id631781

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Electron beam powder bed fusion additive.pdf
Size:
16.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article