<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css">
Repository logo

Can Lateral Cyclic Reactive Jump Ability Be Reliably Measured Using an Inertial Measurement Unit?

aut.relation.articlenumber6532
aut.relation.endpage6532
aut.relation.issue20
aut.relation.journalSensors
aut.relation.startpage6532
aut.relation.volume26
dc.contributor.authorMichalak, Margaret M
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Chloe M
dc.contributor.authorEhlert, Alex
dc.contributor.authorLian, Yuxiao
dc.contributor.authorSlocum, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Leslie
dc.contributor.authorVillarreal, Hailey
dc.contributor.authorCronin, John
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-19T20:03:06Z
dc.date.issued2026-10-15
dc.description.abstractJump testing is widely used to assess lower-limb power, force absorption, and stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) function; however, lateral cyclic tests remain underexplored despite their relevance to change-of-direction performance. This study determined the intra- and inter-session reliability of a novel cyclic lateral leg power test using an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Seventeen female athletes completed three identical testing sessions separated by seven days. Participants performed 10 consecutive lateral bounds at distances of 1.0×, 1.25×, and 1.5× leg length on each limb. A foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) (Output Sports Ltd., Dublin, Ireland) quantified contact time (CT) and air time (AT), with the five shortest values for each variable analyzed. Reliability was assessed using percent change in the mean, coefficients of variation (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Between-session changes were small (−7.9% to 6.6%), with no significant session effects for CT or AT. CVs ranged from 9.2% to 21.8%, with only CT at 1.0× leg length between Sessions 1 and 2 below 10%. ICCs ranged from 0.12 to 0.76, indicating poor-to-good relative reliability. Overall, the IMU-instrumented lateral cyclic test demonstrated largely unacceptable reliability, particularly at greater jump distances, indicating that further protocol refinement is required before implementation in clinical or performance settings.
dc.identifier.citationSensors, ISSN: 1424-8220 (Print); 1424-8220 (Online), MDPI AG, 26(20), 6532-6532. doi: 10.3390/s26206532
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s26206532
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/22179
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/26/20/6532
dc.rights© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject46 Information and Computing Sciences
dc.subject4008 Electrical Engineering
dc.subject4009 Electronics, Sensors and Digital Hardware
dc.subject4606 Distributed Computing and Systems Software
dc.subjectClinical Research
dc.subject0301 Analytical Chemistry
dc.subject0805 Distributed Computing
dc.subject0906 Electrical and Electronic Engineering
dc.subject4009 Electronics, sensors and digital hardware
dc.subjectchange of direction
dc.subjectstretch-shortening cycle
dc.subjectcontact time
dc.subjectair time
dc.subjectfemale athletes
dc.subjectwearable technology
dc.subjectsports performance
dc.titleCan Lateral Cyclic Reactive Jump Ability Be Reliably Measured Using an Inertial Measurement Unit?
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id776640

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Can Lateral Cyclic Reactive Jump Ability Be Reliably Measured Using an Inertial Measurement Unit.pdf
Size:
2.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article