Repository logo
 

The Variability of Dual-Task Walking Parameters Using In-Shoe Inertial Sensors in Nonconcussed Individuals: A Randomized Within-Subject Repeated Measures Design

aut.relation.articlenumbere1660
aut.relation.issue10
aut.relation.journalHealth Science Reports
aut.relation.startpagee1660
aut.relation.volume6
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, C
dc.contributor.authorCronin, J
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-20T22:56:25Z
dc.date.available2023-11-20T22:56:25Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-25
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: There is a need for high utility and portability, and cost-effective technologies that are suitable for assessing dual-task gait after experiencing a concussion. Current technologies utilized such as 3D motion capture and force plates are too complex and expensive for most practitioners. The aim of this study was to quantify the variability of dual-task walking gait parameters using in-shoe inertial sensors in nonconcussed individuals. Methods: This was a randomized within-subject repeated measures design conducted within a sports laboratory. Twenty healthy, uninjured, nonconcussed participants were recruited for this study. Gait variables of interest were measured across three 2-min continuous walking protocols (12 m, 30 m, 1 min out and back) while performing a cognitive task of counting backward in sevens from a randomly generated number between 300 and 500. Testing was completed over three occasions separated by 7 days, for a total of nine walking trials. Participants completed the testing protocols in a randomized, individual order. The primary outcome was to determine the variability of dual-task walking gait parameters using in-shoe inertial sensors in nonconcussed individuals across three protocols. Results: Three to four participants were allocated to each randomized protocol order. Regarding the absolute consistency (coefficient of variation [CV]) between testing occasions, no gait measure was found to have variability above 6.5%. Relative consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) was acceptable (>0.70) in 95% of the variables of interest, with only three variables < 0.70. Similar variability was found across the three testing protocols. Conclusion: In-shoe inertial sensors provide a viable option for monitoring gait parameters. This technology is also reliable across different testing distances, thus offering various testing options for practitioners. Further research needs to be conducted to examine the variability with concussed subjects.
dc.identifier.citationHealth Science Reports, ISSN: 2398-8835 (Print); 2398-8835 (Online), Wiley, 6(10), e1660-. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1660
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hsr2.1660
dc.identifier.issn2398-8835
dc.identifier.issn2398-8835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/16969
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.1660
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectconcussion
dc.subjectgait
dc.subjectinertial measurement unit
dc.subject42 Health Sciences
dc.subject4207 Sports Science and Exercise
dc.subjectBioengineering
dc.subjectClinical Research
dc.subjectClinical Trials and Supportive Activities
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subject32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
dc.subject42 Health sciences
dc.titleThe Variability of Dual-Task Walking Parameters Using In-Shoe Inertial Sensors in Nonconcussed Individuals: A Randomized Within-Subject Repeated Measures Design
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id529312

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mitchell & Cronin_2023_The variability of dual‐task walking parameters using in‐shoe inertial sensors.pdf
Size:
968.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article