Repository logo
 

Comprehensive Plastic Waste Characterisation to Enhance Landfill Diversion in New Zealand’s Construction Industry

aut.relation.endpage2742
aut.relation.issue6
aut.relation.journalSustainability
aut.relation.startpage2742
aut.relation.volume17
dc.contributor.authorLow, Joanne K
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, German
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Penelope
dc.contributor.authorSteinhorn, Gregor
dc.contributor.authorWaghela, Harshal
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, Cole
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Ciarán
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Terri-Ann
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-01T22:31:14Z
dc.date.available2025-04-01T22:31:14Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-19
dc.description.abstractThe plastic profile of construction waste is varied and complex, particularly when compared to other waste streams such as timber, concrete, metals, and plasterboard. There are fewer incentives for recycling this low-density, low-value waste stream. Plastic waste generated by construction activities remains poorly characterised, obstructing efforts to optimise reduction, reuse, and recycling practices. To understand its types and sources, and better address plastic waste management, this study audited plastic waste produced across six new-build construction sites in Auckland, New Zealand. A total of 7.2 tonnes of plastic construction waste was collected on-site and audited. Plastics were separated, weighed, and categorised by function and construction stage. Polymer type was determined using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. In total, 62% of plastic waste was diverted from landfill through reuse or recycling. On average, 0.61 kg of plastic was generated per m2 of construction. Soft plastics were the most generated by mass (33%), followed by PVC and HDPE pipes (22%), shrink wrap (12%), and expanded polystyrene (5%). The majority of plastic waste was generated in the final stages of the projects. The authors recommend the separation of soft plastic, pipes, shrink wrap, and polystyrene on construction sites, particularly towards the finishing stages of construction.
dc.identifier.citationSustainability, ISSN: 2071-1050 (Print); 2071-1050 (Online), MDPI AG, 17(6), 2742-2742. doi: 10.3390/su17062742
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su17062742
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/18973
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2742
dc.rights© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject33 Built Environment and Design
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject41 Environmental Sciences
dc.subject4005 Civil Engineering
dc.subject3302 Building
dc.subject12 Built Environment and Design
dc.subjectplastic waste
dc.subjectconstruction waste
dc.subjectcircular economy
dc.subjectcharacterisation
dc.subjectrecycling
dc.titleComprehensive Plastic Waste Characterisation to Enhance Landfill Diversion in New Zealand’s Construction Industry
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id597746

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Low et al., 2025.pdf
Size:
882.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article