Repository logo

Phishing Email Detection Using Subject and Body Text: A Comparative Study of Transformers, Bi-LSTM, and Traditional Classifiers

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

Size: 555.45 KB, File format: Adobe PDF
Size: 419.88 KB, File format: Microsoft Word 2007+

Authors

Htet Kyaw, Phyo

Gutierrez, Jairo

Ghobakhlou, Akbar

Supervisor

Degree name

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

AIS Electronic Library

Abstract

Phishing emails continue to bypass blacklist, signature, and rule-based defenses, motivating the development of detectors that can learn robust patterns from message content. This Research-in-Progress paper reports completed results for the subject+body text module of a planned multi-segment phishing email detector covering headers, URLs, and attachments. We compare Transformer-based models (BERT, DistilBERT, DeBERTa-v3-base, DeBERTa-v3-small) with recurrent neural models (LSTM, Bi-LSTM) and traditional classifiers (Logistic Regression, SVM, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes) under consistent preprocessing and evaluation settings. DeBERTa-v3-small achieves the strongest overall performance on the text module (F1 = 0.9972, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) = 0.9950), followed closely by BERT (F1 = 0.9969, MCC = 0.9944). DistilBERT provides a strong efficiency–effectiveness trade-off (F1 = 0.9957, MCC = 0.9922), and a linear SVM remains competitive among traditional classifiers (F1 = 0.9963, MCC = 0.9933). At batch size 1, the model-only inference time is 4.84 ms/message for DistilBERT, compared with 8.98 ms/message for BERT and 12.27 ms/message for DeBERTa-v3-small. These results provide a strong baseline for the text module, and future work will implement the remaining modules and measure their added value through controlled ablation and fusion studies.

Description

Keywords

4604 Cybersecurity and privacy, 4611 Machine learning, Phishing detection, Phishing email, Email security, Deep learning

Source

International Conference on Information Resources Management (CONF-IRM) 2026 Proceedings. 11. ISSN 2744-6220

DOI

Rights statement

This is the Authors' Manuscript of a conference paper published in the Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Resources Management (CONFIRM) 2026. The publisher's version is available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/confirm2026/11/

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By