Active Contributors or Compliers? Using the Friedman Doctrine to Explain Multinational Enterprises’ Response to Climate Change
Loading...
Files
Size: 1.35 MB, File format: Adobe PDF
Date
Authors
Rammal, Hussain Gulzar
Wijewardena, Chanaka
Ghauri, Pervez N
Rašković, Matevž
Dang, Quyen Thao
Supervisor
Item type
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Abstract
This study examines how multinational enterprises (MNEs) in the automotive sector respond to stakeholder and institutional pressures to mitigate climate change. Drawing on institutional, stockholder (Friedman doctrine), and stakeholder theories, we analyze how formal regulatory frameworks and informal stakeholder demands influence corporate environmental strategies. The research demonstrates that, while MNEs face increasing pressure to be environmentally responsible, substantive sustainability initiatives are predominantly driven by formal institutional mechanisms rather than by voluntary stakeholder responses. This confirms the Friedman doctrine, which holds that firms will respond to mandates when required by law. Through a systematic analysis of two leading electric vehicle manufacturers, Tesla and BYD, we explore how varying institutional environments shape corporate climate strategies. The findings reveal that regulatory frameworks serve as primary catalysts for meaningful environmental action, while informal pressures primarily influence communication strategies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. This study contributes to the growing literature on corporate environmental responsibility by illuminating the relationship between institutional pressures and strategic responses in the context of climate change mitigation.
Description
Keywords
1503 Business and Management, Business & Management, 3505 Human resources and industrial relations, 3507 Strategy, management and organisational behaviour, Multinational enterprises, Climate change, Automotive industry, Institutional theory, Stockholder theory, Friedman doctrine, Corporate responsibility
Source
Management International Review, ISSN: 0938-8249 (Print); 1861-8901 (Online), Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi: 10.1007/s11575-026-00640-9
Publisher's version
Rights statement
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Permanent link
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution License