<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css">
Repository logo

Three-Dimensional and Immersive Visualisation for Flood Risk Communication: A Critical Review of Mechanisms, Evidence and Evaluation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

Size: 6.88 MB, File format: Adobe PDF

Authors

Kaleshani, F

Jelodar, MB

Piadeh, F

Wilkinson, S

Balaei, B

Supervisor

Degree name

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Abstract

Flood risk visualisation has advanced rapidly over approximately the past decade, but technological sophistication has not always been matched by evidence of communication effectiveness or operational readiness. This critical review examines when, why, and under what conditions 3D and immersive visualisation supports flood risk communication. Following a PRISMA-guided process a final analytical corpus comprised 42 studies. The findings reveal a shift from static and technically oriented flood representation toward situated experience, public communication, evacuation training, collaborative interpretation, and decision support. GIS, BIM, and web-based 3D systems continue to provide the analytical foundation of the field, while virtual, augmented, and mixed-reality tools increasingly translate flood information into place-based and experiential forms. The most consistently reported benefits relate to spatial understanding, engagement, perceived realism, risk awareness, and decision support. However, these benefits are highly dependent on audience expertise, communication purpose, representational complexity, and the task being supported. Evidence quality remains uneven, with many studies relying on prototypes, small samples, expert feedback, or short-term usability assessments, and relatively few progressing to comparative, longitudinal, or operational validation. The review challenges the assumption that more immersive visualisation is necessarily more effective. Instead, effectiveness depends on alignment among audience, communication mechanism, flood-management stage, evaluation maturity, and implementation conditions. To support this alignment, the review proposes the Audience, Mechanism, Stage, Evaluation, Implementation framework, which links design choices, evidence strength, and implementation requirements. The central question is whether a particular visualisation approach provides a credible, accessible, and decision-relevant improvement for a defined audience and context.

Description

Keywords

35 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services, 3507 Strategy, Management and Organisational Behaviour, Dissemination and Implementation Research, Flood risk communication, Immersive visualisation, 3D visualisation, Risk perception, Disaster preparedness, Virtual reality

Source

Progress in Disaster Science, ISSN: 2590-0617 (Print); 2590-0617 (Online), Elsevier BV, 32, 100739-100739. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100739

Rights statement

© 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution