GamblingLess: In-The-Moment: A Mixed-Methods Acceptability and Engagement Evaluation of a Gambling Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention
Date
Authors
Dowling, NA
Merkouris, SS
Greenwood, CJ
Youssef, GJ
Thomas, AC
Hawker, CO
Lubman, DI
Rodda, SN
Supervisor
Item type
Journal Article
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mobile health interventions, particularly dynamic Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs), can overcome barriers to gambling treatment by offering timely, accessible support in people's everyday lives. GamblingLess: In-The-Moment is a theoretically-informed and evidence-based app-delivered JITAI to people who want to quit or reduce their gambling. The JITAI aims to reduce gambling symptom severity through short-term reductions in the likelihood of gambling episodes by improving cognitive vulnerability (craving intensity, self-efficacy, or positive outcome expectancies). It administers three daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) to deliver tailored interventions in moments of cognitive vulnerability. Given that intervention acceptability and engagement are likely to improve clinical outcomes, this study aimed to comprehensively examine these constructs for GamblingLess: In-The-Moment. METHODS: A 28-day micro-randomised trial (MRT) was conducted, with a supplementary six-month within-group follow-up evaluation and a mixed-methods acceptability/engagement evaluation. The acceptability/engagement evaluation included: (1) app use and engagement indices across the MRT (n = 192; 66% male; agemedian=35 years); (2) app acceptability measures administered at post-intervention (n = 161; 84% completion rate), and (3) semi-structured interviews (n = 11). RESULTS: App use and engagement indices indicated that the JITAI was an attractive option for gambling support. Participants completed 5,116 EMAs (compliance rate = 32%, averaging 27 EMAs), spent an average of 30 min in the app, and completed an average of nine intervention activities from a pool of 53 activities they could repeatedly access. Subjective quality and perceived impact scores well exceeded minimally acceptable standards but 77% of participants preferred a hybrid push-pull approach and many endorsed less frequent EMAs (52%) but a longer program (58%). Participants also endorsed additional features, such as in-person support, motivational messages, gambling feedback, saving favourite activities, online discussion boards, virtual computer coaches, and in-app rewards. Interviews revealed two distinct themes: (1) facilitation of gambling reductions through check-ins/availability, personal tailoring, seamless and holistic support, and treatment experience suitability; and (2) promoting behaviour change through enhanced awareness, goal-setting, skill-building, and positive habit formation. CONCLUSIONS: GamblingLess: In-The-Moment was highly accepted and was generally perceived as effective in supporting reductions in gambling behaviour. The findings underscore the iterative process for JITAI development and highlight several avenues for its optimisation, particularly in relation to enhancing user engagement and reducing user fatigue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The evaluation was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000490774) in March, 2022.Description
Keywords
App, Ecological momentary intervention, Gambling, Just-in-time adaptive intervention, MHealth, Microrandomized trial, Mobile health, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1701 Psychology, 4203 Health services and systems, 4206 Public health, 5203 Clinical and health psychology
Source
Addict Sci Clin Pract, ISSN: 1940-0640 (Online), Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 20(1), 80-. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00608-4
Publisher's version
Rights statement
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.