Environmental matters in financial reporting: a question of audit materiality??

Chiang, CKH
Item type
Conference Contribution
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
AUT University

This paper examines the issue of audit materiality in regard to the disclosure of environmental matters in financial reports. Its purpose is to reveal auditors’ views and practices when judging the materiality of environmental matters. It also highlights implications for how environmental matters are audited and for the reliability of financial reporting by firms whose activities may generate adverse environmental effects. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-seven senior public and private sector financial auditors in New Zealand. The findings reveal that auditors’ interpretations of materiality criteria tend to preclude them from considering environmental matters in their audits. This contributes to a ‘type II audit expectation gap’ – i.e. a gap between the expectations of standards setters and the practices of auditors (Specht and Waldron, 1992) – which impedes the achievement of appropriate, independent assurance on environmental matters in financial reports. This paper is the first to draw on interview evidence from auditors to examine how they deal with the issue of materiality in regard to this important, emerging aspect of audit practice. This study was conducted in a New Zealand context only. However, since auditors’ duties are similar the world over, the findings point to general avenues for promoting improved practice in regard to the audit of environmental matters.

Audit materiality , Environmental matters , Financial audits , Audit expectation gap , Auditing profession
2011 AFAANZ Conference, Darwin, NT, Australia, 2011-07-02 - 2011-07-06
Rights statement
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in (see Citation). The original publication is available at (see Publisher's Version)