Repository logo
 

Using Multiple-Hop Assessments and Reactive Strength Indices to Differentiate Sprinting Performance in Sportsmen

aut.relation.articlenumber1685
aut.relation.endpage1685
aut.relation.issue4
aut.relation.journalApplied Sciences
aut.relation.startpage1685
aut.relation.volume15
dc.contributor.authorSharp, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorNeville, Jonathon
dc.contributor.authorNagahara, Ryu
dc.contributor.authorWada, Tomohito
dc.contributor.authorCronin, John
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-11T19:22:37Z
dc.date.available2025-02-11T19:22:37Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-07
dc.description.abstractMultiple-hop tests are commonly used in both performance and rehabilitation settings to assess neuromuscular function. This study aimed to explore the relationship between hop performance and sprint ability. Specifically, it focused on three goals: (1) examining the connection between 3-Hop and 5-Hop distances and sprint performance and comparing the strength of relationship between hop kinetics and sprint times; (2) investigating two methods of calculating the 3-Hop and 5-Hop Reactive Strength Indexes (RSIhors) and their relationship to sprinting; and (3) assessing whether hop ratios or kinetic variables could distinguish sprinters of varying abilities. Forty-four male sportsmen participated, completing 3-Hop and 5-Hop tests and sprint times (5–45 m) over 54 inground force platforms. Ground reaction forces (GRFs) were collected during hop trials and horizontal and vertical hop propulsive and braking kinetics were determined. Results showed strong negative correlations between hop distances and sprint times (r = −0.700 to −0.796), while kinetic variables showed weaker relationships with sprint performance (r = −0.554 to 0.017). RSIhor, derived from hop distance, correlated more strongly with sprint performance than RSIhor from flight time. Hop ratios (5-Hop/3-Hop) did not differentiate fast from slow sprinters, and maximal vertical force and horizontal propulsive impulse were the best predictors of 10 m and 40 m sprint times. These findings suggest that hop distance and RSIhor are valuable tools for assessing sprint performance and reactive strength.
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences, ISSN: 2076-3417 (Print); 2076-3417 (Online), MDPI AG, 15(4), 1685-1685. doi: 10.3390/app15041685
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app15041685
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/18629
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/4/1685
dc.rights© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleUsing Multiple-Hop Assessments and Reactive Strength Indices to Differentiate Sprinting Performance in Sportsmen
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id589509

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sharp et al._2025_Using Multiple-hop assessments.pdf
Size:
633.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article