Combating Greenwashing of Construction Products in New Zealand and Australia: A Critical Analysis of Environmental Product Declarations

Simple item page
aut.relation.endpage9671
aut.relation.issue22
aut.relation.journalSustainability
aut.relation.startpage9671
aut.relation.volume16
dc.contributor.authorMoshood, Taofeeq Durojaye
dc.contributor.authorRotimi, James Olabode Bamidele
dc.contributor.authorRotimi, Funmilayo Ebun
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-19T23:43:41Z
dc.date.available2024-11-19T23:43:41Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-06
dc.description.abstractThe construction industry’s increasing environmental impact has led to the widespread adoption of sustainability claims, yet the prevalence of greenwashing—where organizations make misleading environmental claims—threatens genuine sustainable development efforts. Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) have emerged as a potential solution, particularly in the New Zealand and Australia construction sectors, where recent government climate regulations have accelerated their adoption. However, the effectiveness of EPDs in combating greenwashing and their practical implementation remain understudied. This research addresses this gap through a comprehensive analysis of EPDs in construction, employing a systematic literature review of 82 articles from 2010 to 2024 across major databases. Using ATLAS.ti 9 software, this study makes three key contributions: (1) develops a novel framework for evaluating EPD programs and their effectiveness in preventing greenwashing, (2) establishes a standardized methodology for assessing the completeness and accuracy of life cycle assessment information in EPDs, and (3) provides evidence-based recommendations for improving EPD implementation in the construction industry. The findings reveal critical shortcomings in current EPD practices, including inconsistent assessment methodologies and incomplete life cycle data. This study proposes specific reforms to enhance EPD reliability and transparency, offering practical guidelines for industry stakeholders to verify environmental claims. These contributions advance both the theoretical understanding of environmental certification systems and practical implementation of sustainable construction practices by developing regulatory frameworks.
dc.identifier.citationSustainability, ISSN: 2071-1050 (Print); 2071-1050 (Online), MDPI AG, 16(22), 9671-9671. doi: 10.3390/su16229671
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su16229671
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/18360
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9671
dc.rights© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject33 Built Environment and Design
dc.subject3302 Building
dc.subject12 Responsible Consumption and Production
dc.subject12 Built Environment and Design
dc.titleCombating Greenwashing of Construction Products in New Zealand and Australia: A Critical Analysis of Environmental Product Declarations
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id575509
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Moshood et al_2024_Combating greenwashing of construction products.pdf
Size:
2.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article
Download
Collections
School of Future Environments - Huri te Ao