A Practitioner’s Guide to the Design of Strategy Map Frameworks
| aut.relation.issue | 3 | en_NZ |
| aut.relation.journal | Pacific Accounting Review | en_NZ |
| aut.relation.volume | 30 | en_NZ |
| dark.contributor.author | Islam, S | en_NZ |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-18T23:59:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-02-18T23:59:26Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-06 | en_NZ |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-08-06 | en_NZ |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this study is to synthesise the prior literature on strategy maps to develop a practitioner’s guide to the design of strategy map frameworks. Robert Kaplan and David Norton introduced the strategy map in their 2000 Harvard Business review article. A strategy map visually represents how the critical elements of an organisation’s strategies are linked together. In an organisation’s strategy execution process, a strategy map complements a performance measurement framework such as the balanced scorecard. Design/methodology/approach: This is a technical paper, which primarily builds on the prior literature on the strategy map design. In particular, this study reviews 41 publications on strategy maps in the period 2000-2015, including observation of 333 strategy map frameworks. Findings: This study develops 14 design principles across seven features of a strategy map framework. This study also identifies a significant lack of empirical research on strategy map design features and principles. Research limitations/implications: Future research could examine whether and why various design features and principles could exert different or same effects (e.g. decision-relevance). Practical implications: The developed design features and principles can be used by practitioners as guidance for developing customised strategy maps for their organisations. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the literature by serving as a “one-stop shop” for both practitioners and researchers seeking a comprehensive understanding of the current state of the strategy map design features and principles. | en_NZ |
| dc.identifier.citation | Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 30 Issue: 3, pp.334-351, https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-05-2017-0038 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/PAR-05-2017-0038 | en_NZ |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0114-0582 | en_NZ |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2041-5494 | en_NZ |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10292/12266 | |
| dc.publisher | Emerald | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/PAR-05-2017-0038 | en_NZ |
| dc.rights | Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2018. Authors retain the right to place his/her pre-publication version of the work on a personal website or institutional repository for non commercial purposes. The definitive version was published in (see Citation). The original publication is available at www.emeraldinsight.com (see Publisher’s Version). | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | OpenAccess | en_NZ |
| dc.subject | Strategy maps; Design features and principles; Balanced scorecard; Performance measurement; Practitioners; Literature review | |
| dc.title | A Practitioner’s Guide to the Design of Strategy Map Frameworks | en_NZ |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| pubs.elements-id | 343519 | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Faculty of Business, Economics and Law | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Faculty of Business, Economics and Law/Accounting | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF/PBRF Business Economics and Law | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF/PBRF Business Economics and Law/Accounting Department PBRF 2018 | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF/PBRF Business Economics and Law/Faculty Review Team PBRF 2018 |
