Staff Responses to Management Control Systems Changes in an Australian University

aut.relation.issueahead-of-print
aut.relation.journalAccounting Research Journal
aut.relation.volumeahead-of-print
dc.contributor.authorBillah, Mamun
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Zahir Uddin
dc.contributor.authorAli, Mohoboot
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T02:47:08Z
dc.date.available2024-02-26T02:47:08Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-13
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study aims to examine staff responses to management control systems (MCS) changes in an Australian university. Through the analysis of the category of staff responses, it aims to understand the perception gaps among the staff at different levels of the university. Design/methodology/approach Using a case study approach on an Australian university, data was collected from interviews with staff across three hierarchical levels to explore their behavioural responses. Findings This study finds that staff at all levels largely complied with MCS changes due to institutional enforcement. Top management emphasised aligning with government policies and funding, often using manipulation and compartmentalisation tactics in implementing the new MCS. Mid-level managers generally favour research strategies but feel excluded from decision-making and have limited influence over funding. They adopted a balancing tactic within a compromise strategy. Meanwhile, operating-level academics had mixed experiences, feeling largely powerless in influencing MCS while also showing instances of self-motivated compliance. Overall, the study reveals varying responses across different hierarchical levels, highlighting the complexities of MCS changes in staff behaviour and attitudes. Research limitations/implications The insights from this study can guide university administrators and policymakers in understanding the intricate variations in staff reactions to institutional changes. By recognising the factors that drive compliance and defiance, institutions can better navigate and implement changes in MCS. Originality/value This research offers a unique perspective on the behavioural side of MCS changes in higher education. By focusing on varied hierarchical levels within a university, the study provides a granular understanding of individual responses, enriching the existing literature on MCS transitions in academia.
dc.identifier.citationAccounting Research Journal, ISSN: 1030-9616 (Print); 1030-9616 (Online), Emerald, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/arj-03-2023-0087
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/arj-03-2023-0087
dc.identifier.issn1030-9616
dc.identifier.issn1030-9616
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/17259
dc.languageen
dc.publisherEmerald
dc.relation.urihttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARJ-03-2023-0087/full/html
dc.rightsCopyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2024. Authors retain the right to place his/her pre-publication version of the work on a personal website or institutional repository for non commercial purposes. The definitive version was published in (see Citation). The original publication is available at www.emeraldinsight.com (see Publisher’s Version).
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.subject35 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services
dc.subject3507 Strategy, Management and Organisational Behaviour
dc.subject4 Quality Education
dc.subject1501 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability
dc.subject1502 Banking, Finance and Investment
dc.subject3501 Accounting, auditing and accountability
dc.subject3502 Banking, finance and investment
dc.titleStaff Responses to Management Control Systems Changes in an Australian University
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id539804
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Billah Ahmed & Ali (2024) ARJ Corrected Proof.pdf
Size:
728.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Staff responses to management control systems changes in an Australian university.pdf
Size:
188.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Evidence for verification