An antipodean phenomenon: comparing the Labo(u)r Party in New Zealand and Australia
| aut.researcher | Markey, Raymond | |
| dc.contributor.author | Markey, R | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-22T03:11:05Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-22T03:11:06Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-22T03:11:14Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-22T03:11:26Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-22T03:11:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-22T03:11:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-22T03:11:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-22T03:11:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-22T03:11:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-22T03:11:28Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The New Zealand Labour Party (NZLP) and the Australian Labor Party (ALP) share many similarities in terms of their ideology, support base and electoral performance. Labour and ideas travelled regularly between New Zealand and Australia. Australian influence was evident in the early NZLP leadership, and New Zealand influenced ALP policy regarding arbitration and age pensions. Subsequently, the NZLP and ALP have enjoyed similar national electoral records and followed broadly similar policies. However, there were always important divergences, particularly in terms of the timing of consolidation and formation of government, the impact of different state structures, the degree of support from farmers, and racial policy. This article surveys the parameters of the shared experience through examining the two parties' political and social environments, their support bases and their ideology and policy. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Labour History, vol.95pp.69 - 95 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10292/3507 | |
| dc.publisher | The Australian Society for the Study of Labour History | |
| dc.relation.replaces | http://hdl.handle.net/10292/3503 | |
| dc.relation.replaces | 10292/3503 | |
| dc.relation.replaces | http://hdl.handle.net/10292/3504 | |
| dc.relation.replaces | 10292/3504 | |
| dc.relation.replaces | http://hdl.handle.net/10292/3505 | |
| dc.relation.replaces | 10292/3505 | |
| dc.relation.replaces | http://hdl.handle.net/10292/3506 | |
| dc.relation.replaces | 10292/3506 | |
| dc.relation.uri | http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lab/95/markey1.html | |
| dc.rights | Content in the History Cooperative database is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the History Cooperative database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder. | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | OpenAccess | |
| dc.title | An antipodean phenomenon: comparing the Labo(u)r Party in New Zealand and Australia | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Business & Law | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Business & Law/Management | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Business & Law/Management/Management PBRF 2012 | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Business & Law/NZWALMI | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF Researchers | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF Researchers/Business & Law PBRF Researchers | |
| pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF Researchers/Business & Law PBRF Researchers/B & L Management |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
