Demon in a Dress: An Exploration of How Television Programming Conceptualises Female Public Relations Practitioners As Monsters
Loading...
Files
Size: 110.71 KB, File format: Adobe PDF
Date
Authors
Nairn, A
Bhargava, D
Supervisor
Item type
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
M/C - Media and Culture
Abstract
[From introduction] The term monster might have its roots in the Latin word monere (to warn), but it has since evolved to have various symbolic meanings, from a terrifying mythical creature to a person of extreme cruelty. No matter the flexibility in use, the term is mostly meant to be derogatory (Asma). As Gilmore puts it, monsters “embody all that is dangerous and horrible in the human imagination” (1). However, it may be argued that monsters sometimes perform the much-needed work of defining and policing our norms (Mittman and Hensel). Since their archetype is predisposed to transgressing boundaries of human integrity (Gilmore), they help establish deviation between human and in-human. Their cognition and action are considered ‘other’ (Kearney) and a means with which people can understand what is right and wrong, and what is divergent from appropriate ways of being.
Description
Keywords
Source
M/C Journal, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2846
DOI
Publisher's version
Rights statement
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Copyright (c) 2021 Angelique Nairn, Deepti Bhargava. Open access.
Copyright (c) 2021 Angelique Nairn, Deepti Bhargava. Open access.
Permanent link
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

