Modeling the Repetitions-in-Reserve-Velocity Relationship: A Valid Method for Resistance Training Monitoring and Prescription, and Fatigue Management.

aut.relation.issue5
aut.relation.journalPhysiol Rep
aut.relation.startpagee15955
aut.relation.volume12
dc.contributor.authorJukic, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorPrnjak, Katarina
dc.contributor.authorHelms, Eric R
dc.contributor.authorMcGuigan, Michael R
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-04T00:20:01Z
dc.date.available2024-03-04T00:20:01Z
dc.date.issued2024-03
dc.description.abstractEstablishing a relationship between repetitions left in reserve and the mean absolute velocity (RIR-velocity relationship) during resistance training (RT) could allow for objective monitoring, prescription, and real-time adjustment of the training load and set-volume. Therefore, we examined the goodness of fit and prediction accuracy of general and individual RIR-velocity relationships in the free-weight back squat exercise. The effects of sex, training status and history, as well as personality traits, on the goodness of fit and the accuracy of these relationships were also investigated. Forty-six resistance-trained people (15 females and 31 males) performed a one-repetition maximum (1RM) test, and two repetitions to failure (RTF) tests 72 h apart. We found greater goodness of fit of individual RIR-velocity relationships compared to general RIR-velocity relationships. Individual, but not general RIR-velocity relationships established in the first testing session yielded acceptable prediction accuracy of RIR (mean error <2 repetitions) in the subsequent testing session, regardless of the load used. Similar results were obtained when both general and individual RIR-velocity relationships were averaged across the loads, suggesting that a single RIR-velocity relationship covering a range of loads can be used instead of traditional RT methods, potentially allowing for better fatigue management and more efficient adaptation.
dc.identifier.citationPhysiol Rep, ISSN: 2051-817X (Online), 12(5), e15955-. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15955
dc.identifier.doi10.14814/phy2.15955
dc.identifier.issn2051-817X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/17284
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals LLC
dc.relation.urihttps://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14814/phy2.15955
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectexercise monitoring
dc.subjectexercise prescription
dc.subjectfatigue
dc.subjectrating of perceived exertion
dc.subjectstrength training
dc.subjectvelocity-based training
dc.subject0606 Physiology
dc.subject1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject1116 Medical Physiology
dc.subject3208 Medical physiology
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMuscle, Skeletal
dc.subject.meshResistance Training
dc.subject.meshMuscle Strength
dc.subject.meshFatigue
dc.subject.meshPrescriptions
dc.titleModeling the Repetitions-in-Reserve-Velocity Relationship: A Valid Method for Resistance Training Monitoring and Prescription, and Fatigue Management.
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id540501
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jukic et al._2024_Modeling the repetitions‐in‐reserve‐velocity relationship.pdf
Size:
4.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article