<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css">
Repository logo

Effects of Edible Insect Enrichment of Meat-Based and Meat Analogue Products on the Nutritional Composition, Techno-Functional Properties, and Acceptability to Consumers: A Systematic Review

aut.relation.endpage2329
aut.relation.issue13
aut.relation.journalFoods
aut.relation.startpage2329
aut.relation.volume15
dc.contributor.authorAmoah, Isaac
dc.contributor.authorLombardo, Mauro
dc.contributor.authorDiako, Charles
dc.contributor.authorAdjei-Boamah, Comfort
dc.contributor.authorAdu Sarpong, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorRush, Elaine
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-20T21:53:28Z
dc.date.issued2026-07-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Meat-based and meat analogue products are commonly consumed foods for protein nourishment across the globe. These food products are promising carrier media that can be targeted for the delivery of edible insect products as a strategy to overcome food neophobia. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of edible insect enrichment on the nutritional, physicochemical, techno-functional, and acceptability of meat-based and meat analogue products for consumers. METHODS: A systematic search for relevant articles was conducted on the databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus on 5 November 2025. A total of 25 papers were included. RESULTS: Edible insects and larvae from mealworms, crickets, grasshoppers, silkworm pupae, and superworms were commonly used to enrich meat-based and meat analogue products. Commonly reported meat products were sausages from pork and beef, pork patties, meat emulsion, and frankfurters. Soya flour was commonly used for meat analogue formulation. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable edible insect incorporation is matrix-dependent, with conventional meat products generally tolerating low substitution levels (≈2.5-10%) before sensory and structural quality declines, whereas meat analogue systems can accommodate substantially higher inclusion (≈10-40% and, in some cases, up to ~60%). However, heterogeneity in formulations and sensory evaluation methods restricts direct comparison across studies.
dc.identifier.citationFoods, ISSN: 2304-8158 (Print); 2304-8158 (Online), MDPI AG, 15(13), 2329-2329. doi: 10.3390/foods15132329
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/foods15132329
dc.identifier.issn2304-8158
dc.identifier.issn2304-8158
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/22190
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/15/13/2329
dc.rights© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectconsumer acceptability
dc.subjectedible insects
dc.subjectinsect protein
dc.subjectmeat analogues
dc.subjectmeat-based products
dc.subjectprotein fortification
dc.subjecttechno-functional properties
dc.subject30 Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
dc.subject31 Biological Sciences
dc.subject3109 Zoology
dc.subject3003 Animal Production
dc.subject3006 Food Sciences
dc.subject2 Zero Hunger
dc.subject0908 Food Sciences
dc.subject3006 Food sciences
dc.subject3106 Industrial biotechnology
dc.titleEffects of Edible Insect Enrichment of Meat-Based and Meat Analogue Products on the Nutritional Composition, Techno-Functional Properties, and Acceptability to Consumers: A Systematic Review
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id776704

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Amoah et al_2026_Effects of Edible Insect Enrichment of Meat-Based and Meat Analogue.pdf
Size:
525.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article