AUT LibraryAUT
View Item 
  •   Open Research
  • AUT Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Sport and Recreation
  • View Item
  •   Open Research
  • AUT Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Sport and Recreation
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Agreement Between Force and Deceleration Measures During Backward Somersault Landings

Bradshaw, EJ; Grech, K; Joseph, CWJ; Calton, M; Hume, PA
Thumbnail
View/Open
Journal article (221.8Kb)
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/10292/15190
Metadata
Show full metadata
Abstract
This study examined the agreement between force platform and inertial measurement unit (IMU) measures of backward somersault landings. Seven female gymnasts performed three trials, taking off from a 90 cm vaulting box and using competition landing technique. Two force platforms (1000 Hz) covered with a 6.4 cm thick carpeted landing surface measured the ground reaction forces. One inertial measurement unit (500 Hz) fixed on the second thoracic vertebra measured peak resultant deceleration of the gymnast. Measurement agreement between vertical and resultant peak force measures, and resultant peak force and peak deceleration was assessed using mean differences, Pearson’s correlation, and Cohen’s effect size (ES) statistics. There was perfect measurement agreement between vertical and resultant peak forces (R = 1.0, p < 0.001; ES = 0.005), but only moderate measurement agreement between resultant peak force and peak resultant deceleration (Mean Difference = −2.16%, R = 0.4, p = ns; ES = 0.121). Backward somersault landings can be assessed using either uni-axial or tri-axial force platforms to measure ground impact load/force, as the landing movements are almost purely vertical. However, force measures are not the same as peak resultant decelerations from IMUs which give an indication of impact shock. Landing load/shock measures are potentially important for injury prevention.
Keywords
Accelerometer; Biomechanics; Gymnastics; impact; Inertial sensor
Date
2020
Source
Sports Biomechanics, DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1743348
Item Type
Journal Article
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
DOI
10.1080/14763141.2020.1743348
Publisher's Version
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14763141.2020.1743348
Rights Statement
Copyright © 2020 Taylor & Francis. Authors retain the right to place his/her pre-publication version of the work on a personal website or institutional repository as an electronic file for personal or professional use, but not for commercial sale or for any systematic external distribution by a third. This is an electronic version of an article published in (see Citation). Sports Biomechanics is available online at: www.tandfonline.com with the open URL of your article (see Publisher’s Version).

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library

 

 

Browse

Open ResearchTitlesAuthorsDateSchool of Sport and RecreationTitlesAuthorsDate

Alternative metrics

 

Statistics

For this itemFor all Open Research

Share

 
Follow @AUT_SC

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library