AUT LibraryAUT
View Item 
  •   Open Research
  • Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Sport and Recreation
  • View Item
  •   Open Research
  • Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Sport and Recreation
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Methods for Regulating and Monitoring Resistance Training

Helms, E; Kwan, K; Sousa, C; Cronin, J; Storey, A; Zourdos, M
Thumbnail
View/Open
Journal article (415.5Kb)
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/10292/13771
Metadata
Show full metadata
Abstract
Individualisation can improve resistance training prescription. This is accomplished via monitoring or autoregulating training. Autoregulation adjusts variables at an individualised pace per performance, readiness, or recovery. Many autoregulation and monitoring methods exist; therefore, this review’s objective was to examine approaches intended to optimise adaptation. Up to July 2019, PubMed, Medline, SPORTDiscus, Scopus and CINAHL were searched. Only studies on methods of athlete monitoring useful for resistance-training regulation, or autoregulated training methods were included. Eleven monitoring and regulation themes emerged across 90 studies. Some physiological, performance, and perceptual measures correlated strongly (r ≥ 0.68) with resistance training performance. Testosterone, cortisol, catecholamines, cell-free DNA, jump height, throwing distance, barbell velocity, isometric and dynamic peak force, maximal voluntary isometric contractions, and sessional, repetitions in reserve-(RIR) based, and post-set Borg-scale ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were strongly associated with training performance, respectively. Despite strong correlations, many physiological and performance methods are logistically restrictive or limited to lab-settings, such as blood markers, electromyography or kinetic measurements. Some practical performance tests such as jump height or throw distance may be useful, low-risk stand-ins for maximal strength tests. Performance-based individualisation of load progression, flexible training configurations, and intensity and volume modifications based on velocity and RIR-based RPE scores are practical, reliable and show preliminary utility for enhancing performance.
Keywords
Autoregulation; Strength; Rating of perceived exertion (RPE); Repetitions in reserve (RIR); Velocity
Date
June 1, 2020
Source
Journal of Human Kinetics volume 74/2020, 23-42 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0011
Item Type
Journal Article
Publisher
De Gruyter Open
DOI
10.2478/hukin-2020-0011
Publisher's Version
http://www.johk.pl/files/10078-74-2020-v74-2020-03.pdf
Rights Statement
The Journal of Human Kinetics is an open access interdisciplinary periodical offering the latest research in the science of human movement studies.

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library

 

 

Browse

Open ResearchTitlesAuthorsDateSchool of Sport and RecreationTitlesAuthorsDate

Alternative metrics

 

Statistics

For this itemFor all Open Research

Share

 
Follow @AUT_SC

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library