Constructing critiques of ornament: what can we know?

Simple item page
aut.researcherEngels-Schwarzpaul, Tina
dc.contributor.authorEngels-Schwarzpaul, A.-Chr.
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-01T01:07:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-04T23:34:46Z
dc.date.available2011-12-01T01:07:40Z
dc.date.available2012-04-04T23:34:46Z
dc.date.copyright2010
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractUsing the example of discussions of ornament and ornamentation, this paper sketches out scenarios in which "minor knowledges" (Foucault) and practices fail to be recognised in mainstream discourses of academics or professionals. The suppression of ornament, as is well known, went hand-in-hand with the putting down of an irrationality and excessiveness ascribed to women, the working class and savages. The latters' relative rise in power, and resulting perspectival changes manifest in, for instance, postmodernism, have freed ornament of some of the stigmata previously attached to it. However, the mechanisms involved in its suppression are still at work, and current frameworks are still based on countless unexamined assumptions. These effectively continue to re-enforce power/knowledge relationships and to marginalise non-fitting outlooks and practices. The paper sets out to discuss and critique some key aspects of knowledge production and the limits of our ability to know. I suggest that some conditions that applied to the discussions of ornamental practices are likely to apply similarly to dilemmas with which designers are confronted today, when they deal with something which is not acceptable or doesn't even feature in the canons into which claims to knowledge solidify. The paper argues for courage on the part of design theorists, professionals and educators to accept uncertainty and to exercise epistemological modesty. A crossover and mutual transformation of different ways of understanding is required if we are to unfold new knowledge and to look at the familiar with new eyes.
dc.identifier.citationAnti-po-des design journal. Volume 1, pp. 53-71.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10292/3600
dc.publisherAnti-po-des Design Research Journal
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/2889
dc.relation.replaces10292/2889
dc.relation.urihttp://www.anti-po-des-designjournal.org.nz/archive/volume-1-2011/abstracts-and-papers/engels-schwarzpaul/
dc.rightsanti-po-des is a not-for-profit research collaboration. The material on the anti-po-des website is copyright to the authors and anti-po-des.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.subjectOrnament
dc.subjectOrnamental practices
dc.subjectKnowledge
dc.subjectClaims to knowledge
dc.subjectNew constructivism
dc.subjectProfessional knowledge
dc.subjectMimesis
dc.titleConstructing critiques of ornament: what can we know?
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.organisational-data/AUT
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Design & Creative Technologies
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Design & Creative Technologies/School of Arts & Design
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/PBRF Researchers
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/PBRF Researchers/Design & Creative Technologies PBRF Researchers
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/PBRF Researchers/Design & Creative Technologies PBRF Researchers/DCT A & D Other
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RO Engels-Schwarzpaul 2011 Constructing critiques of ornament-what can we know.pdf
Size:
616.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
licence.htm
Size:
29.98 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
Download
Collections
School of Art and Design - Te Kura Toi a Hoahoa