The Struggle to Live and Let Live: The Psychology, Ethics and Politics of Tolerance, or, Why Discrimination is Preferable to Tolerance

Simple item page
aut.relation.endpage181
aut.relation.issue2en_NZ
aut.relation.journalATA: Journal of Psychotherapy Aotearoa New Zealanden_NZ
aut.relation.pages9
aut.relation.startpage173
aut.relation.volume17en_NZ
aut.researcherFay, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorFay, Jen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-24T02:30:50Z
dc.date.available2019-09-24T02:30:50Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_NZ
dc.date.issued2014en_NZ
dc.description.abstractWhen faced with the intolerance of the imperialist who denigrates and annihilates other ways of life, one answer is the principle of tolerance as advocated by multiculturalism and biculturalism. This asserts that each way of life has its own legitimacy, to be valued on its own terms, and that its differences with other ways of life ought to be tolerated. The concept of figure and ground is a helpful way of conceptualising the practice of tolerance, making room for inclusive, both/and forms of existence. It is an image for the attempt to live and let live, in which differences — mountain and sea — coexist in harmony with each other. Whilst broadly in favour of this world view, I will nevertheless inquire into some of its beliefs and assumptions. Amongst other things, I argue that the “cultural group” is not the straightforward category it is often portrayed as, but always a conflictual, problematic and politicised entity. This in turn problematises the activity of tolerance: what is the psychology of tolerance and how is it informed by the political context? What is taking place within us when we are actively tolerating something? Is tolerance necessarily and always a good thing? Are there occasions when intolerance (and therefore, conflict) is the ethical requirement? In this article I argue that the ideals of “respecting difference”, “inclusivity”, “tolerance” are not only ethical but also always political. In sum, I argue for the virtues of discrimination over those of tolerance.
dc.identifier.citationAta: Journal of Psychotherapy Aotearoa New Zealand, 17(2), 159-172. Retrieved from https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/ata/index.php/ata/article/view/111
dc.identifier.doi10.9791/ajpanz.2013.16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10292/12851
dc.publisherNew Zealand Association of Psychotherapists (NZAP) Inc., and supported by the School of Public Health & Psychosocial Studies, Auckland University of Technology
dc.relation.urihttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/ata/index.php/ata/article/view/111
dc.rightsAll open journal, conference and research summary content originally published on Tuwhera is Creative Commons licenced (CC-BY preferred) to facilitate reuse with attribution.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccessen_NZ
dc.subjectDiscrimination; Tolerance; Diversity; Multiculturalism; Biculturalism
dc.titleThe Struggle to Live and Let Live: The Psychology, Ethics and Politics of Tolerance, or, Why Discrimination is Preferable to Toleranceen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id316738
pubs.organisational-data/AUT
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Health & Environmental Science
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Health & Environmental Science/Public Health & Psych Studies
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/PBRF
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/PBRF/PBRF Health and Environmental Sciences
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/PBRF/PBRF Health and Environmental Sciences/HY Public Health & Psychosocial Studies 2018 PBRF
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The Struggle to Live and Let Live....pdf
Size:
122.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AUT Grant of Licence for Scholarly Commons Feb2017.pdf
Size:
239.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
School of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Studies