Comparison of Stiffness Measurements of Wooden Rods Using Acoustic Guided Wave and Static Bending Test Techniques

Abstract

Traditionally, mechanical bending tests are used to measure the stiffness of lumber, which is generally represented by the static modulus of elasticity (MoE). However, it is desirable to measure the stiffness of wood before it is processed into lumber. Acoustic nondestructive testing techniques are therefore the main techniques used by the wood industry to estimate the dynamic MoE of wood. The acoustic resonance technique is employed for measuring the MoE in felled logs and lumber. In contrast, the acoustic time-of-flight (ToF) technique is traditionally used for MoE measurements on standing trees and seedlings. However, the ToF technique overestimates stiffness compared to both resonance and static bending tests (considered the gold standard). In this work, a guided wave technique is used to measure the stiffness of wooden rods. This work is the first to compare the MoE values obtained using static bending tests (gold standard) with those obtained using acoustic resonance, ToF, and guided wave methods. Measurements were performed on 16 mm diameter radiata pine wooden rods. For comparison, measurements were also performed on acetal, aluminium, and steel rods of similar dimensions. The findings show that stiffness measurements obtained using the proposed guided wave method are more accurate than those obtained using the traditional ToF method and closely match those of the resonance method across all materials. The measurements from the ToF method were overestimated compared to resonance, guided wave, and static bending methods. The findings show the potential for the guided wave method to be used as an alternative method to provide more accurate stiffness measurements in juvenile trees/seedlings compared with the traditional ToF technique.