Repository logo
 

Factors Influencing Imaging Clinical Decision-Making in Low Back Pain Management. A Scoping Review

aut.relation.articlenumbere1898
aut.relation.issue2
aut.relation.journalMusculoskeletal care
aut.relation.volume22
dc.contributor.authorHill, Julia
dc.contributor.authorSaywell, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorNiazi, Imran
dc.contributor.authorLuke, Tanner
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Tom
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-17T04:17:32Z
dc.date.available2024-06-17T04:17:32Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-11
dc.description.abstractBackground The use of diagnostic imaging in low back pain (LBP) management is often inappropriate, despite recommendations from clinical practice guidelines. There is a limited understanding of factors that influence the imaging clinical decision-making (CDM) process. Aim Explore the literature on factors influencing imaging CDM for people with LBP and consider how these findings could be used to reduce inappropriate use of imaging in LBP management. Design Scoping review. Method This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review extension for scoping reviews. A digital search was conducted in Medline, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for eligible studies published between January 2010–2023. Data reporting influences on imaging CDM were extracted. Data were then analysed through an inductive process to group the influencing factors into categories. Results After screening, 35 studies (5 qualitative and 30 quantitative) were included in the review, which reported factors influencing imaging CDM. Three categories were developed: clinical features (such as red flags, pain, and neurological deficit), non-modifiable factors (such as age, sex, and ethnicity) and modifiable factors (such as beliefs about consequences and clinical practice). Most studies reported non-modifiable factors. Conclusions The results of this scoping review challenge the perception that imaging CDM is purely based on clinical history and objective findings. There is a complex interplay between clinical features, patient and clinician characteristics, beliefs, and environment. These findings should be considered when designing strategies to address inappropriate imaging behaviour.
dc.identifier.citationMusculoskeletal care, ISSN: 1478-2189 (Print); 1557-0681 (Online), Wiley, 22(2). doi: 10.1002/msc.1898
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/msc.1898
dc.identifier.issn1478-2189
dc.identifier.issn1557-0681
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/17662
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/msc.1898
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Musculoskeletal Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject1110 Nursing
dc.subjectArthritis & Rheumatology
dc.subject4205 Nursing
dc.titleFactors Influencing Imaging Clinical Decision-Making in Low Back Pain Management. A Scoping Review
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id556474

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Musculoskeletal Care - 2024 - Tanner - Factors influencing imaging clinical decision‐making in low back pain management A.pdf
Size:
746.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article