Dimensionality and Scaling Properties of the Patient Categorisation Tool in Patients With Complex Rehabilitation Needs Following Acquired Brain Injury
| aut.relation.endpage | 443 | |
| aut.relation.issue | 5 | |
| aut.relation.journal | Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine | |
| aut.relation.startpage | 435 | |
| aut.relation.volume | 50 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Siegert, Richard J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Medvedev, Oleg | |
| dc.contributor.author | Turner-Stokes, Lynne | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-11T01:56:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-03-27 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To investigate the scaling properties of the Patient Categorisation Tool (PCAT) as an instrument to measure complexity of rehabilitation needs. Design: Psychometric analysis in a multicentre cohort from the UK national clinical database. Patients: A total of 8,222 patents admitted for specialist inpatient rehabilitation following acquired brain injury. Methods: Dimensionality was explored using principal components analysis with Varimax rotation, followed by Rasch analysis on a random sample of n = 500. Results: Principal components analysis identified 3 components explaining 50% of variance. The partial credit Rasch model was applied for the 17-item PCAT scale using a "super-items" methodology based on the principal components analysis results. Two out of 5 initially created super-items displayed signs of local dependency, which significantly affected the estimates. They were combined into a single superitem resulting in satisfactory model fit and unidimensionality. Differential item functioning (DIF) of 2 super-items was addressed by splitting between age groups (< 65 and ≥ 65 years) to produce the best model fit (?2/df = 54.72, p = 0.235) and reliability (Person Separation Index (PSI) = 0.79). Ordinal-tointerval conversion tables were produced. Conclusion: The PCAT has satisfied expectations of the unidimensional Rasch model in the current sample after minor modifications, and demonstrated acceptable reliability for individual assessment of rehabilitation complexity. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN: 1650-1977 (Print); 1651-2081 (Online), Foundation of Rehabilitation Information, 50(5), 435-443. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2327 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2340/16501977-2327 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1650-1977 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1651-2081 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10292/21961 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Foundation of Rehabilitation Information | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://medicaljournalssweden.se/jrm/article/view/12533 | |
| dc.rights | © 2018 Foundation of Rehabilitation Information. Open access. | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | OpenAccess | |
| dc.rights.license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | rehabilitation | |
| dc.subject | brain injury | |
| dc.subject | psychometrics | |
| dc.subject | health services needs and demands | |
| dc.subject | Rasch analysis | |
| dc.subject | Science & Technology | |
| dc.subject | Life Sciences & Biomedicine | |
| dc.subject | Sport Sciences | |
| dc.subject | number | |
| dc.subject | model | |
| dc.subject | 4201 Allied Health and Rehabilitation Science | |
| dc.subject | 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences | |
| dc.subject | 42 Health Sciences | |
| dc.subject | Bioengineering | |
| dc.subject | 1103 Clinical Sciences | |
| dc.subject | 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences | |
| dc.subject | 3202 Clinical sciences | |
| dc.subject | 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Brain Injuries | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Cohort Studies | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Inpatients | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Principal Component Analysis | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Psychometrics | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility of Results | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Brain Injuries | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Cohort Studies | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility of Results | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Psychometrics | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Principal Component Analysis | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Inpatients | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Brain Injuries | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Cohort Studies | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Inpatients | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Male | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Principal Component Analysis | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Psychometrics | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility of Results | |
| dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
| dc.title | Dimensionality and Scaling Properties of the Patient Categorisation Tool in Patients With Complex Rehabilitation Needs Following Acquired Brain Injury | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| pubs.elements-id | 334340 |
