Development of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (Strond) Checklist: A Guideline for the Reporting of Incidence and Prevalence Studies in Neuroepidemiology

aut.relation.endpage828
aut.relation.issue9en_NZ
aut.relation.journalNeurologyen_NZ
aut.relation.startpage821
aut.relation.volume85en_NZ
aut.researcherFeigin, Valery
dc.contributor.authorBennett, DAen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBrayne, Cen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorFeigin, Ven_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBarker-Collo, Sen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorBrainin, Men_NZ
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Den_NZ
dc.contributor.authorGallo, Ven_NZ
dc.contributor.authorJetté, Nen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorKarch, Aen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorKurtzke, JFen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorLavados, PMen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorLogroscino, Gen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorNagel, Gen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorPreux, PMen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorRothwell, PMen_NZ
dc.contributor.authorSvenson, LWen_NZ
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-06T22:50:53Z
dc.date.available2016-10-06T22:50:53Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_NZ
dc.date.issued2016en_NZ
dc.description.abstractBackground: Incidence and prevalence studies of neurologic disorders play an important role in assessing the burden of disease and planning services. However, the assessment of disease estimates is hindered by problems in reporting for such studies. Despite a growth in published reports, existing guidelines relate to analytical rather than descriptive epidemiologic studies. There are also no user-friendly tools (e.g., checklists) available for authors, editors, and peer reviewers to facilitate best practice in reporting of descriptive epidemiologic studies for most neurologic disorders. Objective: The Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) is a guideline that consists of recommendations and a checklist to facilitate better reporting of published incidence and prevalence studies of neurologic disorders. Methods: A review of previously developed guidance was used to produce a list of items required for incidence and prevalence studies in neurology. A 3-round Delphi technique was used to identify the “basic minimum items” important for reporting, as well as some additional “ideal reporting items.” An e-consultation process was then used in order to gauge opinion by external neuroepidemiologic experts on the appropriateness of the items included in the checklist. Findings: Of 38 candidate items, 15 items and accompanying recommendations were developed along with a user-friendly checklist. Conclusions: The introduction and use of the STROND checklist should lead to more consistent, transparent, and contextualized reporting of descriptive neuroepidemiologic studies resulting in more applicable and comparable findings and ultimately support better health care decisions.
dc.identifier.citationNeurology, September 1, 2015 vol. 85 (no. 9), p. 821-828
dc.identifier.doi10.1212/WNL.0000000000001866en_NZ
dc.identifier.issn0028-3878en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10292/10065
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088602
dc.rightsPublisher's version/PDF deposited available in PubMed Central may be deposited in institutional repository 12 months embargo after publication.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccessen_NZ
dc.titleDevelopment of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (Strond) Checklist: A Guideline for the Reporting of Incidence and Prevalence Studies in Neuroepidemiologyen_NZ
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id206242
pubs.organisational-data/AUT
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Health & Environmental Science
pubs.organisational-data/AUT/Health & Environmental Science/Health Faculty Office
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
strond.pdf
Size:
292.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RE4.10 Grant of Licence.docx
Size:
14.05 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word 2007+
Description: