Repository logo
 

The Acceptability of Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Response Among Refugee Women Accessing Australian Resettlement Services

aut.relation.issue12
aut.relation.journalPLoS ONE
aut.relation.startpagee0315061
aut.relation.volume19
dc.contributor.authorSpence, N
dc.contributor.authorSpangaro, J
dc.contributor.authorMan, N
dc.contributor.authorCameron, J
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, K
dc.contributor.authorKoziol-McLain, Jane
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, T
dc.contributor.authorPerry-Indermaur, A
dc.contributor.authorToole-Anstey, C
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, J
dc.contributor.authorZwi, A
dc.contributor.editorMunro-Kramer, Michelle L
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-30T00:13:55Z
dc.date.available2025-01-30T00:13:55Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-18
dc.description.abstractScreening and response for intimate partner violence (IPV) is recommended for women in priority populations and is implemented in health services across diverse jurisdictions. Most women experiencing IPV strongly support screening, however this is untested with refugee women in resettlement contexts. Around one third of refugee women in Australia experience IPV and face multiple post-migration challenges. SAHAR (Safety and Health after Arrival) tested IPV screening using the ACTS tool, brief intervention, and referral with women accessing four settlement support services. Women attending sites during the study period were invited to participate in a three month follow up survey with participation by 321/375 women recruited (86%). Acceptability of IPV screening was assessed against (i) levels of comfort with the IPV screening questions and (ii) strength of agreement/disagreement with settlement services asking women about being frightened, controlled or hurt by their partners. Of participants who recalled the screening, 93% reported being very or moderately comfortable with being asked the questions (89% who had experienced IPV; 94% of those with no IPV identified). For all participants, 84% strongly or somewhat agreed with services asking the questions, with no significant difference in agreement between disclosing and non-disclosing groups. Those with no recall of the questions had lower overall agreement and higher disagreement than those who recalled the questions (88% and 10%). Acceptability was not associated with age, country of origin, household composition, time since arrival or number of prior service visits. Participants identified ‘care shown by the worker’, ‘talking to someone in my own language’, ‘trust in the privacy of the service’, and ‘talking to a female worker’ as the factors most important for encouraging discussion of IPV. High acceptance of IPV screening by refugee women supports consideration of implementation across settlement services, a key access point for refugee women with diverse needs.
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203 (Print); 1932-6203 (Online), Public Library of Science (PLoS), 19(12), e0315061-. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315061
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0315061
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/18567
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0315061
dc.rights© 2024 Spence et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject4203 Health Services and Systems
dc.subject42 Health Sciences
dc.subject44 Human Society
dc.subjectViolence Research
dc.subjectViolence Against Women
dc.subjectMental Health
dc.subjectHealth Services
dc.subjectClinical Research
dc.subjectWomen's Health
dc.subjectBehavioral and Social Science
dc.subject5 Gender Equality
dc.subjectGeneral Science & Technology
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshRefugees
dc.subject.meshIntimate Partner Violence
dc.subject.meshAustralia
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshMass Screening
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult
dc.subject.meshPatient Acceptance of Health Care
dc.subject.meshAdolescent
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMass Screening
dc.subject.meshAdolescent
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshRefugees
dc.subject.meshPatient Acceptance of Health Care
dc.subject.meshAustralia
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.meshIntimate Partner Violence
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshRefugees
dc.subject.meshIntimate Partner Violence
dc.subject.meshAustralia
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshMass Screening
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult
dc.subject.meshPatient Acceptance of Health Care
dc.subject.meshAdolescent
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.titleThe Acceptability of Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Response Among Refugee Women Accessing Australian Resettlement Services
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id582613

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The acceptability of intimate partner violence screening and response among refugee women.pdf
Size:
19.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article