Repository logo
 

Attitudes Towards Research in Graduate-Entry Australian Physiotherapy Students: A Survey

aut.relation.issue1
aut.relation.journalHealth Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learning
aut.relation.volume7
dc.contributor.authorStubbs, P
dc.contributor.authorAltre, C
dc.contributor.authorVerhagen, A
dc.contributor.authorBartley, N
dc.contributor.authorMcCambridge, Alana
dc.contributor.authorBorja, J
dc.contributor.authorHaylock, L
dc.contributor.authorDang, K
dc.contributor.authorPate, J
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-16T21:02:34Z
dc.date.available2025-02-16T21:02:34Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the attitudes towards research in a two-year, graduate-entry Master of Physiotherapy course. Methodology: All students starting (T0) and ending (T1) their degrees in 2020 and 2021 were invited to complete the revised Attitudes Towards Research Questionnaire. This is a three-factor instrument with 13 statements assessing Research Usefulness (four statements, scores ranging from 4 to 28), Research Anxiety (five statements, scores ranging from 5 to 35), and Positive Research Predispositions (four statements, scores ranging from 4 to 28). Each statement was scored using a seven-item Likert scale ranging from ‘Strongly Agree’ (1) to ‘Strongly Disagree’ (7). Student responses between T1 and T0 for factor scores were compared using independent samples t-tests and summarised using mean differences (95% CIs). We defined the minimally important difference as 15% of the scale range. Findings: Ninety-seven percent (n=124/129) of students completed the survey at T0 and 57% (n=79/125) at T1. We found no difference between T0 and T1 in research anxiety (0.2 points, 95% CI: –1.5 to 2.0) and research usefulness (–0.9 points, 95% CI: –1.8 to 0.1), but a significant (although not meaningful) decrease in positive research predispositions between T0 and T1 (–1.7 points, 95% CI –3.2 to –0.2). Research implications: Qualitative research could complement these quantitative findings and provide in-depth reasons for student scores. Practical implications: Educators need more active strategies to improve attitudes and engagement in research-focused subjects to further engage students. Originality/value: This is the first study to document attitudes towards research in an Australian graduate-entry Master of Physiotherapy program. Limitations: There is likely bias (unclear in which direction) at T1 given that 57% of students completed the survey. Surveys were not linked, so group differences were assessed independently.
dc.identifier.citationHealth Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learning, ISSN: 2209-3974 (Print); 2209-3974 (Online), Health Education and Training Institute - HETI, 7(1). doi: 10.33966/hepj.7.1.18040
dc.identifier.doi10.33966/hepj.7.1.18040
dc.identifier.issn2209-3974
dc.identifier.issn2209-3974
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/18672
dc.publisherHealth Education and Training Institute - HETI
dc.relation.urihttps://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/HEP/article/view/18040
dc.rights© 2019 Health Education & Training Institute. This journal is licenced under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subject32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subject3202 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject42 Health Sciences
dc.titleAttitudes Towards Research in Graduate-Entry Australian Physiotherapy Students: A Survey
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id561321

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
668de768a57b0.pdf
Size:
372.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article