Multiple Long-Term Conditions, Co-Long-Term Conditions and Polyvascular Disease: Considerations for Evidence Synthesis and Meta-Analyses
Date
Authors
Mead, Gillian
Todhunter‐Brown, Alex
Abaraogu, Ukachukwu
Barugh, Amanda
Chauhan, Arohi
Lopez, Juan Erviti
Feigin, Valery
Kshatri, Jaya Singh
Mizuno, Atsushi
Pati, Sanghamitra
Supervisor
Item type
Journal Article
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Abstract
Cochrane's scientific strategy for 2025 to 2030 has four research priorities, including improving the lives of people living with multiple chronic conditions. The purpose of this article written by the Cochrane Thematic Group in Heart, Stroke and Circulation is to explore considerations around multiple chronic conditions (also referred to as ‘multiple long‐term conditions’ i.e. two or more long‐term conditions) in systematic reviews. Rather than using the term ‘comorbidity’, we introduce a new term ‘co‐long‐term conditions’. We also explore how to define ‘polyvascular disease’. We suggest that review authors consider co‐long‐term conditions and multiple long‐term conditions in their reviews e.g. extract data about how primary studies address co‐long‐term conditions, perform subgroup analyses according to presence or not of co‐long‐term conditions, and include a section in the discussion about how well participants with co‐long‐term conditions were represented in the primary studies. This is especially pertinent for reviews addressing heart, circulatory or stroke disease, and polyvascular disease.Description
Keywords
Source
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods, ISSN: 2832-9023 (Print); 2832-9023 (Online), Wiley, 3(3). doi: 10.1002/cesm.70027
Publisher's version
Rights statement
© 2025 The Author(s). Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.