To QRE or Not To QRE? An Evaluation of Alternative Models in Behavioural Game Theory
| aut.embargo | No | |
| aut.thirdpc.contains | No | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ryan, Matthew | |
| dc.contributor.author | Smith, Logan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-03T21:44:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-03T21:44:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | I conduct a targeted conceptual synthesis and evaluation of competing stochastic models of behaviour for normal form games. I present a review of Quantal Response Equilibrium (QRE) followed by a detailed discussion of two new stochastic models of behaviour, Noisy Belief Equilibrium (NBE) which introduces noise to beliefs instead of actions, and M equilibrium which introduces noise to both beliefs and actions. I contribute to existing literature by expanding on the relationship between NBE, Nash equilibrium, and QRE while also providing further analysis of the relationship between M equilibrium and Nash equilibrium. Additionally, I contribute to existing knowledge by proving key relationships between QRE, NBE, and M equilibrium in specific instances of generic 2 X 2 games. I briefly compare the parametric forms of each equilibrium model in two theoretical games before discussing areas of future research. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10292/19472 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Auckland University of Technology | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | OpenAccess | |
| dc.title | To QRE or Not To QRE? An Evaluation of Alternative Models in Behavioural Game Theory | |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Auckland University of Technology | |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Business |
