Repository logo
 

Oracle Upper Bounds on Clean-EEG Recoverability from Single-Channel Decompositions Under EOG/EMG Contamination

aut.relation.endpage2581
aut.relation.issue9
aut.relation.journalSensors
aut.relation.startpage2581
aut.relation.volume26
dc.contributor.authorShaikh, Usman Qamar
dc.contributor.authorKalra, Anubha Manju
dc.contributor.authorLowe, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorNiazi, Imran Khan
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-23T20:57:04Z
dc.date.available2026-04-23T20:57:04Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-22
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>Objective: Single-channel EEG artifact suppression often relies on signal decomposition; however, it is not always clear how much clean EEG is recoverable from a given decomposition when component weighting is ideal. We present an oracle-based benchmark that characterises this best-case recoverability across common 1-D decomposition families under controlled EOG, EMG, and mixed contamination. This work does not propose a new denoising algorithm; rather, it isolates representation capacity from component-selection heuristics by computing an upper bound on reconstruction quality. Approach: Using EEGdenoiseNet, we constructed a synthetic benchmark of 4500 single-channel 2 s segments (125 Hz; T = 250) by mixing clean EEG with ocular (EOG) and/or cranial EMG exemplars at noise-to-signal ratios (NSRs) spanning −10 to +10 dB (floor −10 dB denotes an absent modality). We evaluated variational mode decomposition (VMD), singular spectrum analysis (SSA), discrete wavelet transform (DWT), and CEEMDAN by decomposing each mixture and reconstructing the clean EEG using a bounded nonnegative linear combination of components obtained via constrained least squares (the oracle). Main results: Under this oracle benchmark, SSA achieved the lowest reconstruction error in most tested conditions, while DWT tended to rank best in milder ocular regimes; VMD performance improved, with an increased mode count at higher computational cost. CEEMDAN exhibited higher latency dominated by ensemble settings. Significance: These results should be interpreted as decomposition-level upper bounds under controlled mixtures, not field-ready denoising performance. The benchmark provides a tool with which to compare representational recoverability across decompositions and to inform the subsequent design of practical component-selection strategies.</jats:p>
dc.identifier.citationSensors, ISSN: 1424-8220 (Online), MDPI AG, 26(9), 2581-2581. doi: 10.3390/s26092581
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s26092581
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/20974
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/26/9/2581
dc.rightsAll articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.subject0301 Analytical Chemistry
dc.subject0502 Environmental Science and Management
dc.subject0602 Ecology
dc.subject0805 Distributed Computing
dc.subject0906 Electrical and Electronic Engineering
dc.subjectAnalytical Chemistry
dc.subject3103 Ecology
dc.subject4008 Electrical engineering
dc.subject4009 Electronics, sensors and digital hardware
dc.subject4104 Environmental management
dc.subject4606 Distributed computing and systems software
dc.titleOracle Upper Bounds on Clean-EEG Recoverability from Single-Channel Decompositions Under EOG/EMG Contamination
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id758954

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sensors-26-02581.pdf
Size:
2.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.37 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: