<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css">
Repository logo

Single-Channel EEG Denoising and Artifact Removal: A Systematic Scoping Review of Methods, Benchmarking, and Reproducibility

aut.relation.journalJournal of Neural Engineering
dc.contributor.authorShaikh, Usman Qamar
dc.contributor.authorKalra, Anubha
dc.contributor.authorLowe, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Imran
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-12T21:42:04Z
dc.date.issued2026-10-06
dc.description.abstractObjective. Single-channel and wearable electroencephalography (EEG) reduce acquisition burden but limit the spatial information available to conventional multichannel artifact-removal methods. We conducted a systematic scoping review of single-channel-compatible EEG artifact removal, linking method operation with artifact coverage, evaluation design, generalisation, deployment, comparison, and reproducibility. Approach. Database and citation searches through 15 August 2026 identified 178 articles describing 199 method variants. For learned methods, 303 reported model–dataset evaluations were also examined for data independence, generalisation, and deployment. Main results. Most variants were reference-free at inference (179/199), while 13 used a non-neural auxiliary reference. Methods spanned seven operating paradigms, including decomposition, transformed source separation, adaptive correction, and learned reconstruction. Ocular and muscle artifacts were evaluated most often, and 38/178 articles tested simultaneous or overlapping mixtures. Across 380 dataset uses, evaluation centred on controlled signal reconstruction. Known-target fidelity was reported for 170/199 variants, compared with 21 for clean-input or non-artifact signal comparison, 32 for contaminated downstream utility, and three for clean-input downstream non-degradation. Among 81 learned variants, 18 reported source-trained application to an external dataset, device, or site; only 31/303 evaluations explicitly separated test windows or epochs, clean sources, and artifact sources from training. No measured deployment evidence was reported for 122/199 variants. Public method resources were available for 21 variants, while trained weights and explicit licences were uncommon. Significance. The review provides a framework for selecting datasets, metrics, comparators, and implementations, and for distinguishing reconstruction, neural preservation, transfer, and wearable deployment evidence.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Neural Engineering, ISSN: 1741-2560 (Print); 1741-2552 (Online), IOP Publishing. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aeb0ce
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1741-2552/aeb0ce
dc.identifier.issn1741-2560
dc.identifier.issn1741-2552
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/22128
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherIOP Publishing
dc.relation.urihttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/aeb0ce
dc.rights© 2026 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. Open access.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution License
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectEEG denoising
dc.subjectartifact removal
dc.subjectbenchmarking
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectscoping review
dc.subjectsingle-channel EEG
dc.subjectwearable EEG
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject4003 Biomedical Engineering
dc.subjectNeurosciences
dc.subjectNetworking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD)
dc.subjectBioengineering
dc.subject0903 Biomedical Engineering
dc.subject1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject1109 Neurosciences
dc.subjectBiomedical Engineering
dc.subject3209 Neurosciences
dc.titleSingle-Channel EEG Denoising and Artifact Removal: A Systematic Scoping Review of Methods, Benchmarking, and Reproducibility
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id775714

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shaikh et al_2026_Single channel EEG.pdf
Size:
645.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article