Repository logo

Australian Research in Infection Prevention and Control: A Bibliometric Review From the Past Two Decades

aut.relation.articlenumber100450
aut.relation.endpage100450
aut.relation.issue4
aut.relation.journalInfection, Disease & Health
aut.relation.startpage100450
aut.relation.volume31
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Brett
dc.contributor.authorMatterson, Georgia
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorStewardson, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorTehan, Peta
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-15T02:27:47Z
dc.date.issued2026-07-14
dc.description.abstractBackground Australia is recognised as a leading contributor to infection prevention and control (IPC) randomised controlled trials. However, the broader landscape of Australian IPC research has not been comprehensively mapped. This bibliometric review examined research trends, thematic focus areas, and methodological approaches in Australian IPC research over the past two decades. Methods A systematic search of Scopus identified IPC-related documents from January 2003 to September 2025. Eligible documents reported original IPC research involving an Australian population and included at least one author with an Australian institutional affiliation. Reviews required an Australian author. Following screening in Covidence, metadata from included documents were analysed using the web application Biblioshiny® to assess publication trends, citation patterns, authorship networks, and international collaboration. Manual thematic coding was undertaken, and reporting followed the BIBLIO checklist. Results A total of 841 documents from 241 sources were included in the analysis. Publication output increased notably from 2013 onward, with further growth during 2020–2021 and again in 2025. Surveillance was the most common research theme (18.2% [153/841]). Observational designs dominated the literature (44.9% [378/841]), while randomised controlled trials accounted for just 1.2% (10/841) of documents. There was extensive international collaboration, involving authors from 81 countries. Conclusion Australian IPC research output has expanded considerably but remains concentrated within a limited number of themes and is dominated by single-centre observational studies. These findings highlight opportunities to diversify methodologies, strengthen evidence quality, and better align future research with IPC practice and policy priorities.
dc.identifier.citationInfection, Disease & Health, ISSN: 2468-0451 (Print), Elsevier BV, 31(4), 100450-100450. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2026.100450
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.idh.2026.100450
dc.identifier.issn2468-0451
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/21587
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045126000441
dc.rightsCC-BY Creative Commons Attribution
dc.rights© 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Open access.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectInfection control
dc.subjectCross-infection
dc.subjectNursing
dc.subjectAustralia
dc.titleAustralian Research in Infection Prevention and Control: A Bibliometric Review From the Past Two Decades
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id769074

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S2468045126000441-main.pdf
Size:
2.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.37 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: