Applying a Health Care Planning Model to Midwifery: Evidence from Germany and New Zealand
Date
Authors
Griese, A
Schüssler, F
Fleming, T
Leinweber, J
Supervisor
Item type
Conference contribution
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Abstract
Background Midwifery workforce planning is essential to ensure equitable access to maternal care but differs widely across countries. Because a dedicated planning tool is lacking, Germany currently does not perform demand-oriented planning for midwifery services. In contrast, New Zealand facilitates planning through centralized data collection and national coordination. This study investigates how planning approaches affect the distribution and accessibility of maternal health care in Germany and New Zealand. Methods Midwifery workforce and population data from Germany and New Zealand were analyzed using a German physician-based demand planning tool adapted for midwifery services. GIS mapping visualized workforce-to-population ratios, spatial accessibility, and socioeconomic disparities in service distribution. Regional care patterns were compared across both systems. Results Application of the adapted physician-based tool in Germany revealed substantial care gaps in rural and peripheral regions, reflecting the absence of a midwifery-specific planning framework. In contrast, assessment in New Zealand showed a more balanced distribution of midwifery services, including remote areas. Centralized workforce monitoring and register-based planning appear to support more equitable access and responsive resource allocation. Conclusions Germany's lack of a dedicated workforce planning system contributes to regional and social inequities in care provision, particularly affecting women with low socioeconomic status. In contrast, New Zealand's structured approach, including centralized monitoring and targeted planning, supports a more balanced distribution across income groups. Adopting such elements may help improve service equity. This study underlines the relevance of tailored planning systems for maternal health and informs policy development. Key messages • Germany’s lack of midwifery planning leads to inequitable access for rural and low-income groups. • New Zealand’s structured system enables more balanced midwifery service provision.Description
Keywords
4204 Midwifery, 4206 Public Health, 42 Health Sciences, Health Disparities and Racial or Ethnic Minority Health Research, Social Determinants of Health, Rural Health, Health Services, Clinical Research, Women's Health, Health Disparities, 3 Good Health and Well Being, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Public Health, 4202 Epidemiology, 4203 Health services and systems, 4206 Public health
Source
European Journal of Public Health, ISSN: 1101-1262 (Print); 1464-360X (Online), Oxford University Press (OUP), 35(Supplement 4), ckaf161.1438-. 18th European Public Health Conference 2025. Investing for sustainable health and well-being. 12–14 November 2025. Helsinki, Finland doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1438
Publisher's version
Rights statement
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.