<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css">
Repository logo

EEG-Centred Computational Biomarkers and Complementary Physiological Signals for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review 2005–2025

aut.relation.articlenumber100298
aut.relation.endpage100298
aut.relation.issue4
aut.relation.journalNeuroscience Informatics
aut.relation.startpage100298
aut.relation.volume6
dc.contributor.authorTruong, Ha
dc.contributor.authorKvasniak, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorAnand, Gautam
dc.contributor.authorKalra, Anubha
dc.contributor.authorMirza, Farhaan
dc.contributor.authorSpooner, Kerri
dc.contributor.authorKrishna, Sruthy
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-26T22:59:58Z
dc.date.issued2026-10-22
dc.description.abstractBackground: Electroencephalography (EEG) provides a portable approach to assessing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early Alzheimer’s disease (AD), while sleep and autonomic signals may offer complementary physiological information. The validation quality of these computational biomarkers remains uncertain. Objective: To systematically evaluate signal-processing approaches, candidate biomarkers, computational models, and risk of bias in an EEG-centred evidence base for MCI and early AD, with complementary physiological studies considered as secondary evidence. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically reviewed 118 studies (2005–2025), comprising 113 direct EEG studies, two studies of polysomnography-derived sleep architecture, and three complementary non-EEG studies, and appraised risk of bias using a PROBAST-informed framework. Results: Recurring EEG findings included spectral slowing, reduced signal complexity, altered event-related potentials, and disrupted functional connectivity. Across 120 extracted performance rows, the median reported accuracy was 93.41%, and values above 95% were common. The proportion classified as High overall risk ranged from 38.1% to 69.5% across operational sample-size thresholds and was 22.0% when sample size was excluded. Twenty-two studies were at high risk of data leakage, only one reported external validation, and longitudinal evidence remained limited (9 studies; none used time-to-event modelling). Conclusions: The EEG-centred literature presents a performance paradox: high reported accuracy coexists with data-leakage concerns, limited external validation, and little longitudinal evidence. Future studies should use design-specific sample-size planning, strict subject-level separation, external validation, and longitudinal outcome modelling to establish clinically reliable computational biomarkers.
dc.identifier.citationNeuroscience Informatics, ISSN: 2772-5286 (Print), Elsevier BV, 6(4), 100298-100298. doi: 10.1016/j.neuri.2026.100298
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuri.2026.100298
dc.identifier.issn2772-5286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/22228
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528626000427
dc.rights© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is an open access article.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons CC-BY license
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject3208 Medical Physiology
dc.subject32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subjectAlzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD)
dc.subjectSleep Research
dc.subjectAging
dc.subjectNeurosciences
dc.subjectAlzheimer's Disease
dc.subjectAcquired Cognitive Impairment
dc.subjectDementia
dc.subjectNeurodegenerative
dc.subjectBrain Disorders
dc.subjectNeurological
dc.subject3 Good Health and Well Being
dc.titleEEG-Centred Computational Biomarkers and Complementary Physiological Signals for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review 2005–2025
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id776641

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Truong et al_2026_EEG-Centred Computational Biomarkers.pdf
Size:
2.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article