Repository logo
 

Effect of Different Chamber Geometries on Combustion Formation to Reduce Harmful Emissions

aut.relation.articlenumber125073
aut.relation.endpage125073
aut.relation.journalApplied Thermal Engineering
aut.relation.startpage125073
aut.relation.volume261
dc.contributor.authorDoppalapudi, AT
dc.contributor.authorAzad, AK
dc.contributor.authorKhan, MMK
dc.contributor.authorThan Oo, AM
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-18T23:25:02Z
dc.date.available2025-02-18T23:25:02Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-15
dc.description.abstractThe combustion process in internal combustion engines is the primary aspect of engine performance and emissions. Combustion chamber geometries such as grooved combustion chamber (GCC), shallow depth combustion chamber (SCC), and bathtub combustion chamber (BTCC) are used to investigate the effect of combustion rates on the emission parameters with respect to the standard flat combustion chamber (FCC). The impact of chamber modifications was simulated with an IC engine model using advanced chemical kinetics. Combustion parameters such as in-cylinder temperature, turbulence, and heat release rates were observed. The validated computational model assisted in analyzing combustion formations and their correlation with emissions like mass fractions, CO, CO2, and NOx. The results revealed that the modified chambers avoided the formation of fuel pockets and improved combustion behaviour compared to FCC. At 440 oCA, peak NOx emissions were higher by 14.95%, 27.10%, and 15.89% for GCC, SCC, and BTCC chambers, respectively, compared to the FCC chamber. At 440 oCA, CO2 emissions increased by 2.22%, 2.78%, and 2.78% for GCC, SCC, and BTCC chambers, respectively, compared to the FCC. The GCC chamber's geometry influences the air–fuel mixture distribution, leading to stratified combustion zones and utilizing both bowl and squish regions. The study concludes that GCC chambers can significantly enhance efficiency and reduce emissions by influencing temperature profiles and mass fraction distributions. The study recommends using the GCC chamber with optimized injection profiles for better combustion and improved swirl rates.
dc.identifier.citationApplied Thermal Engineering, ISSN: 1359-4311 (Print), Elsevier BV, 261, 125073-125073. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.125073
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.125073
dc.identifier.issn1359-4311
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/18685
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431124027418
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject4017 Mechanical Engineering
dc.subject4002 Automotive Engineering
dc.subject13 Climate Action
dc.subject0913 Mechanical Engineering
dc.subject0915 Interdisciplinary Engineering
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subject4012 Fluid mechanics and thermal engineering
dc.subject4017 Mechanical engineering
dc.titleEffect of Different Chamber Geometries on Combustion Formation to Reduce Harmful Emissions
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id582525

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Effect of different chamber geometries.pdf
Size:
20.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article