Reliability of measuring abductor hallucis muscle parameters using two different diagnostic ultrasound machines
aut.relation.journal | Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | en_NZ |
aut.relation.startpage | 33 | |
aut.relation.volume | 2 | en_NZ |
dark.contributor.author | Hing, WA | en_NZ |
dark.contributor.author | Rome, K | en_NZ |
dark.contributor.author | Cameron, AF | en_NZ |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-10T22:41:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-10T22:41:21Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009 | en_NZ |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_NZ |
dc.description.abstract | Background Diagnostic ultrasound provides a method of analysing soft tissue structures of the musculoskeletal system effectively and reliably. The aim of this study was to evaluate within and between session reliability of measuring muscle dorso-plantar thickness, medio-lateral length and cross-sectional area, of the abductor hallucis muscle using two different ultrasound machines, a higher end Philips HD11 Ultrasound machine and clinically orientated Chison 8300 Deluxe Digital Portable Ultrasound System. Methods The abductor hallucis muscle of both the left and right feet of thirty asymptomatic participants was imaged and then measured using both ultrasound machines. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to calculate both within and between session intra-tester reliability. Standard error of the measurement (SEM) calculations were undertaken to assess difference between the actual measured score across trials and the smallest real difference (SRD) was calculated from the SEM to indicate the degree of change that would exceed the expected trial to trial variability. Results The ICCs, SEM and SRD for dorso-plantar thickness and medial-lateral length were shown to have excellent to high within and between-session reliability for both ultrasound machines. The between-session reliability indices for cross-sectional area were acceptable for both ultrasound machines. Conclusion The results of the current study suggest that regardless of the type ultrasound machine, intra-tester reliability for the measurement the abductor hallucis muscle parameters is very high. | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 2009, 2:33, https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-33 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1757-1146-2-33 | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.issn | 1757-1146 | en_NZ |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10292/11548 | |
dc.language | eng | en_NZ |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | |
dc.relation.uri | https://jfootankleres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1757-1146-2-33 | |
dc.rights | This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | |
dc.rights.accessrights | OpenAccess | en_NZ |
dc.subject | Hallux Valgus; Abductor Hallucis; Muscle Parameter; Interclass Correlation Coefficient; Abductor Hallucis Muscle | |
dc.title | Reliability of measuring abductor hallucis muscle parameters using two different diagnostic ultrasound machines | en_NZ |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
pubs.elements-id | 36339 | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Health & Environmental Science | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/Health & Environmental Science/Clinical Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF/PBRF Health and Environmental Sciences | |
pubs.organisational-data | /AUT/PBRF/PBRF Health and Environmental Sciences/HH Clinical Sciences 2018 PBRF |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Reliability of measuring abductor hallucis muscle parameters using two different diagnostic ultrasound machines.pdf
- Size:
- 342.09 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Journal article
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- AUT Grant of Licence for Scholarly Commons Feb2017.pdf
- Size:
- 239.25 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: