Effectiveness of Problem Gambling Brief Telephone Interventions: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Date
Supervisor
Item type
Commissioned Report
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ministry of Health – Manatū Hauora, New Zealand Government
Abstract
Summary of project/aims AUT was contracted by the Ministry of Health in January 2009 to deliver a study of the effectiveness of interventions for problem gambling. Five key aims were agreed for this project, which were to: - generate reliable findings on the effectiveness of intervention services in producing positive outcomes on a range of measures and impact on others - increase the body of evidence available on the clinical effectiveness of common problem gambling intervention practices in New Zealand and inform future clinical practice - compare the effectiveness (on a range of outcomes) of common problem gambling interventions in New Zealand with common problem gambling intervention practices that have been validated internationally, including pharmaceutical interventions - identify client characteristics that mitigate the effectiveness of validated interventions, with particular attention to client ethnicity and primary gambling mode - develop a potential two stage research proposal that builds upon this project to provide additional evidence on the long-term effectiveness and outcomes of the treatment under trial.Description
Keywords
Source
Effectiveness of problem gambling brief telephone interventions: A randomised controlled trial
Provider No: 467589, Contract No: 326673/00 and 326673/01
Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology
Final Report, 13 December 2012
DOI
Rights statement
For content covered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence, you are free to:
share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
adapt — remix, transform and build upon the material.
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits.