Most Systematic Reviews of Dry Needling for Musculoskeletal Pain Have High Risk of Bias: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
Loading...
Files
Size: 1.29 MB, File format: Adobe PDF
Date
Authors
Jenkins, Luke
Scanlon, Evin
Verhagen, Arianne P
Nasser, Anthony
McCambridge, Alana
Overton, Mark
Stubbs, Peter W
Supervisor
Item type
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
JOSPT Inc. d/b/a Movement Science Media
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to evaluate the risk of bias (ROB) of systematic reviews on the effectiveness of dry needling in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. The secondary aim was to summarize findings related to harms.
DESIGN: Systematic review of systematic reviews
LITERATURE SEARCH: Five databases were searched until December 2024.
STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Systematic reviews that compared dry needling to any intervention
DATA SYNTHESIS: ROB was assessed using the ROB in Systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool. The type and frequency of harms reported in primary trials was extracted. A descriptive analysis was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 5190 studies were identified with 38 reviews included. Reviews were published between 2009–2024. One review (3%) had low ROB and 31 reviews (82%) had high ROB. Five (13%) reviews were low risk for ‘Eligibility Criteria’, four (11%) for ‘Identification and Selection of Studies’, twelve (32%) for ‘Data collection and Appraisal’ and two (5%) were low risk for ‘Synthesis and Findings’. Twenty-one (55%) reviews reported on harms related to dry needling. When reported, harms were mostly minor and transitory (e.g., post-needling soreness). Moderate harms included syncope (4 patients), presentation to hospital with fever, chills and a systemic upset (1 patient), chest pain (1 patient) and severe pain (1 patient).
CONCLUSION: Due to the high ROB in most systematic reviews, clear clinical recommendations for dry needling in the management of musculoskeletal pain cannot be confidently made. The inconsistent reporting of harms may result in their underestimation or overestimation.
Description
Keywords
32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, 3202 Clinical Sciences, 42 Health Sciences, Chronic Pain, Pain Research, 7.1 Individual care needs, Musculoskeletal, disability, dry needling, function, harms, myofascial trigger points, pain
Source
JOSPT Methods, ISSN: 3065-8195 (Print); 3065-8195 (Online), Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT), 1-40. doi: 10.2519/josptmethods.2026.0022
Publisher's version
Rights statement
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Permanent link
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0