Repository logo
 

The Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Program for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Compared to Low Back Pain and Chronic Widespread Pain: An Observational Study

aut.relation.endpage188
aut.relation.issue4
aut.relation.journalPain Medicine
aut.relation.startpage180
aut.relation.volume26
dc.contributor.authorBean, Debbie
dc.contributor.authorTuck, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorMagni, Nico
dc.contributor.authorAamir, Tipu
dc.contributor.authorPollard, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Gwyn
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-15T00:00:15Z
dc.date.available2025-04-15T00:00:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-12
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Little research has assessed the efficacy of interdisciplinary pain management programs (IPMPs) for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), whereas evidence shows that IPMPs are effective for low back pain (LBP) and chronic widespread pain (CWP). This study aimed to determine whether outcomes following an IPMP differ for people with CRPS compared to LBP and CWP. In addition, we determined whether it is possible to predict IPMP outcomes using baseline characteristics. METHODS: People with CRPS (N = 66) who had completed a 3-week IPMP were compared with age- and gender- matched controls with LBP (N = 66) and CWP (N = 66). Measures of pain intensity, pain interference and psychological factors were extracted for pre- and post-program, and at 1, 6 and 12 months. Latent class analysis identified recovery trajectories for pain intensity and pain interference. Chi-square analyses assessed differences between diagnostic groups in recovery trajectories. Machine learning models were implemented to predict recovery trajectories from baseline scores. RESULTS: Two recovery trajectories for each dependent variable (pain interference and for pain intensity) were identified: good responders and poorer responders. Following IPMPs, 37% of people belonged to a good responder recovery trajectory for pain interference, and 11% belonged to a good responder recovery trajectory for pain intensity. Recovery trajectories were equal across the three diagnostic groups (CRPS, LBP, CWP) for pain interference (χ2=1.8, p=0.4) and intensity (χ = 0.2, p=0.9). Modelling to predict outcomes correctly classified 69% of cases for pain interference and 88% of cases for pain intensity recovery trajectories using baseline scores. CONCLUSION: People with CRPS, LBP, and CWP experience similar benefits following an IPMP. This supports the use of IPMPs for people with CRPS.
dc.identifier.citationPain Medicine, ISSN: 1526-2375 (Print); 1526-4637 (Online), Oxford University Press, 26(4), 180-188. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae126
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pm/pnae126
dc.identifier.issn1526-2375
dc.identifier.issn1526-4637
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/19063
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.urihttps://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/26/4/180/7922563
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectchronic widespread pain
dc.subjectcognitive behavioral therapy
dc.subjectComplex regional pain syndrome
dc.subjectfibromyalgia
dc.subjectinterdisciplinary pain management program
dc.subjectlow back pain
dc.subjectrehabilitation
dc.subjectchronic widespread pain
dc.subjectcognitive behavioral therapy
dc.subjectcomplex regional pain syndrome
dc.subjectfibromyalgia
dc.subjectinterdisciplinary pain management program
dc.subjectlow back pain
dc.subjectrehabilitation
dc.subject4201 Allied Health and Rehabilitation Science
dc.subject32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subject3202 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject42 Health Sciences
dc.subjectPain Research
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectChronic Pain
dc.subjectNeurosciences
dc.subjectBack Pain
dc.subjectClinical Research
dc.subjectNeurological
dc.subject1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
dc.subject1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.subjectAnesthesiology
dc.subject3202 Clinical sciences
dc.subject4203 Health services and systems
dc.subject5203 Clinical and health psychology
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshLow Back Pain
dc.subject.meshComplex Regional Pain Syndromes
dc.subject.meshChronic Pain
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshPain Management
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshPain Measurement
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshComplex Regional Pain Syndromes
dc.subject.meshLow Back Pain
dc.subject.meshPain Measurement
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshPain Management
dc.subject.meshChronic Pain
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshLow Back Pain
dc.subject.meshComplex Regional Pain Syndromes
dc.subject.meshChronic Pain
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshPain Management
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.subject.meshPain Measurement
dc.titleThe Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Program for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Compared to Low Back Pain and Chronic Widespread Pain: An Observational Study
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id581495

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The efficacy of an interdisciplinary pain management program for complex regional pain syndrome compared to low back pain and chronic widespread pain.pdf
Size:
1012.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article