‘It Enables the Carers to See the Person First’: Qualitative Evaluation of Point-of-Care Digital Management System in Residential Aged Care

Date
2022-03-14
Authors
Bail, Kasia
Gibson, Diane
Hind, Alicia
Strickland, Karen
Paterson, Catherine
Merrick, Eamon
Gibson, Jo
Kozlovskaia, Maria
O'Dea, Amy
Smith, Bridget
Supervisor
Item type
Journal Article
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate acceptability, efficiency, and quality of a new digital care management system in a residential aged care home (RACH).

BACKGROUND: Improving care quality and efficiency in RACH, while simultaneously upgrading data management, is a priority for communities and governments.

DESIGN: Participatory action research with mixed methods data collection was employed to evaluate a digital care management system implemented at a 169-bed RACH. This paper reports qualitative findings of the 2-year evaluation.

METHODS: Qualitative data were collected using focus groups with residents, visitors, nurses, managers, care workers, and consultants; resident/visitor and staff hallway interviews and responses to open-ended questions in online staff surveys. Data were analysed thematically under the four predetermined study objectives. Reporting adhered to COREQ guidelines.

RESULTS: 325 data captures from 88 participants, over seven data sources were coded. Findings indicate that the system was acceptable to both residents and staff due to perceptions of time-saving and improved quality of care. Increased efficiency was perceived through timeliness as well as reduced time spent retrieving and documenting information. Quality of care was improved through care scheduling individualised to resident needs, with reminders to avoid missed care. Relatives were reassured and activities were scheduled to loved one's preferences. The co-design implementation process was successful through commitment to quality from leadership teams and prioritising the focus on the holistic needs of the residents.

CONCLUSION: A strong emphasis on co-design with care staff in developing and implementing the digital care system contributed to a system that supported nursing and care work, facilitated reporting and documentation, and improved resident care and well-being including identification of missed care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses, carers, administrators, and advocates can support the co-design creation of information systems that suit the workflow of an organisation and keep the focus on individualised models of care provision.

Description
Keywords
dementia , efficiency - organisational , geriatrics , long-term care , nursing , nursing homes , nursing informatics , patient-centred care , point-of-care systems , quality of health care , dementia , efficiency - organisational , geriatrics , long-term care , nursing , nursing homes , nursing informatics , patient-centred care , point-of-care systems , quality of health care , Science & Technology , Life Sciences & Biomedicine , Nursing , dementia , efficiency , organisational , geriatrics , long-term care , nursing , nursing homes , nursing informatics , patient-centred care , point-of-care systems , quality of health care , ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS , PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH , NURSING DOCUMENTATION , NURSES , TRIANGULATION , FACILITIES , SERVICES , IMPACT , HOMES , 4203 Health Services and Systems , 4205 Nursing , 42 Health Sciences , Clinical Research , Health Services , 8 Health and social care services research , 8.1 Organisation and delivery of services , Generic health relevance , 3 Good Health and Well Being , 1110 Nursing , 1117 Public Health and Health Services , 1701 Psychology , Nursing , 4203 Health services and systems , 4205 Nursing
Source
Journal of Clinical Nursing, ISSN: 0962-1067 (Print); 1365-2702 (Online), Wiley, 32(1-2), 174-190. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16285
Rights statement