<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css">
Repository logo

A Systematic Review of AI Methods Across the MRI Analysis Pipeline for Multiple Sclerosis Progression Prediction

aut.relation.endpage8955
aut.relation.issue18
aut.relation.journalApplied Sciences Switzerland
aut.relation.startpage8955
aut.relation.volume16
dc.contributor.authorVenkatasamy, U
dc.contributor.authorWang, A
dc.contributor.authorSchierding, W
dc.contributor.authorKwon, E
dc.contributor.authorDanesh-Meyer, HV
dc.contributor.authorHoldsworth, S
dc.contributor.authorShi, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T21:09:05Z
dc.date.issued2026-09-09
dc.description.abstractMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prediction of multiple sclerosis (MS) progression depends on how imaging data are prepared, represented, modelled, and evaluated. This systematic review synthesized artificial intelligence (AI) methods across the MRI-to-prediction pipeline. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published from 2010 to March 2026. Eligible studies included patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome, used brain MRI directly or as the source of predictors, evaluated future progression-related outcomes, and reported quantitative predictive performance. Thirty-seven studies were included and synthesized narratively because of methodological and outcome heterogeneity. Prediction targets included CIS-to-MS/CDMS conversion, future MRI disease activity, PIRA/PIRMA, disability worsening or confirmed progression, future EDSS or disability status, and RRMS-to-SPMS conversion. Lesion morphology and location, radiomics, tissue atrophy, longitudinal imaging changes, and multimodal variables provided useful prognostic information. Classical machine learning (ML) remained effective for structured biomarkers, while deep learning (DL) enabled direct image-based modelling; neither approach was uniformly superior. PROBAST + AI assessment rated model Development as High concern in 35 of 37 studies and Unclear in two, Evaluation as High risk of bias in all 37 studies, and Applicability as Low concern in 32, Unclear in two, and High in three. Overall, MRI-based AI shows promising prognostic potential, while stronger data separation, calibration, transparent reporting, and independent validation are needed to support reproducible clinical translation.
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences Switzerland, ISSN: 2076-3417 (Print); 2076-3417 (Online), MDPI AG, 16(18), 8955-8955. doi: 10.3390/app16188955
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app16188955
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/22258
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/16/18/8955
dc.rights© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article.
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution License
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subject3202 Clinical Sciences
dc.subjectData Science
dc.subjectHealth Disparities and Racial or Ethnic Minority Health Research
dc.subjectNetworking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD)
dc.subjectAutoimmune Disease
dc.subjectBioengineering
dc.subjectBiomedical Imaging
dc.subjectMultiple Sclerosis
dc.subjectNeurodegenerative
dc.subjectNeurosciences
dc.subjectBrain Disorders
dc.subjectHealth Disparities
dc.subjectMachine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
dc.subject4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
dc.subjectNeurological
dc.subject3 Good Health and Well Being
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectdeep learning
dc.subjectlesion segmentation
dc.subjectradiomics
dc.subjectprogression prediction
dc.titleA Systematic Review of AI Methods Across the MRI Analysis Pipeline for Multiple Sclerosis Progression Prediction
dc.typeJournal Article
pubs.elements-id776921

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Venkatasamy et al_2026_A systematic review of AI methods across the MRI analysis pipeline.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal article