The Impact of Indirect Transport to a Trauma Centre on Survival for Major Trauma Patients: A National Propensity-Adjusted Observational Study
Loading...
Files
Size: 1.57 MB, File format: Adobe PDF
Date
Authors
Davie, Gabrielle
Dicker, Bridget
Lilley, Rebbecca
Campbell, Nicola
Ameratunga, Shanthi
Civil, Ian
Branas, Charles
Reid, Papaarangi
de Graaf, Brandon
Montoya, Luisa
Supervisor
Item type
Degree name
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Swansea University
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: An optimally structured prehospital trauma care system can reduce the consequences of serious injuries. While trauma systems in some countries have adopted the policy of transporting major trauma patients directly to a trauma centre (TC) bypassing closer lower-level hospitals, other countries have been less directive in adopting this policy. OBJECTIVE: To explore the short-term survival of direct versus indirect transfer to a definitive care TC for major trauma patients injured in locations in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) where there was an opportunity for indirect transportation. METHODS: National administrative data from the NZ Trauma Registry and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were linked. Major trauma patients for whom there was no hospital closer than the definitive care TC were excluded. Propensity-weighted adjusted models were used to compare mortality (2-week and 30-day) between those for whom EMS transported directly versus indirectly. RESULTS: Of 1,008 patients considered to have an opportunity for transfer, 370 (36.7%) were admitted at one hospital before their definitive care TC. Similar percentages of directly and indirectly transported patients died within 30 days (8.9% and 10.0% respectively; p = 0.6). Lower 2-week (aRR 0.64, 95%CI 0.38, 1.06) and 30-day mortality (aRR 0.70, 95%CI 0.42, 1.16) were observed for those transported indirectly. Older (≥55 years) indirectly transported patients were estimated to have a 30-day mortality aRR of 0.56 (95%CI 0.30, 1.05) that of those directly transported whereas, for younger patients, the direction and strength of evidence differed (aRR 1.31; 95%CI 0.64, 2.69). CONCLUSION: For major trauma patients in NZ, this study found no evidence of a statistically significant difference in short-term mortality between those transported directly and indirectly, although point estimates suggest possible lower mortality, particularly for older patients, amongst those transported indirectly. Study limitations, including wide confidence intervals, are emphasised and additional research is needed to further confirm these findings and aid in nation-specific delivery of trauma care.
Description
Keywords
ambulance, emergency medical services, major trauma, population, transport pathway, 42 Health Sciences, Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects, Clinical Research, Emergency Care, Generic health relevance, 3 Good Health and Well Being, 42 Health sciences, 44 Human society, 46 Information and computing sciences
Source
Int J Popul Data Sci, ISSN: 2399-4908 (Print); 2399-4908 (Online), Swansea University, 11(1), 3388-. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v11i1.3388
Publisher's version
Rights statement
CC-BY. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Permanent link
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC-BY. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.