Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLewis, GN
dc.contributor.authorSignal, N
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, D
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-14T20:46:00Z
dc.date.available2013-11-14T20:46:00Z
dc.date.copyright2013-10-05
dc.date.issued2013-11-15
dc.identifier.citationClin Neurophysiol (2013), DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.029
dc.identifier.issn1872-8952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10292/5871
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine the intra- and inter-session reliability of motor evoked potential (MEP) size parameters in the lower limb of patients with stroke, focussing on the number of MEPs collected and the method of measuring MEP size. Methods Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to elicit MEPs in the soleus muscle of patients with stroke (n = 13) and age-matched healthy participants (n = 13) during low level muscle activation. Two sets of 10 responses were collected in the first session and a further 10 responses collected in a second session held 7 days later. Four MEP size measurements were made using 4, 6, 8, or all 10 of the MEPs collected. Intra- and inter-session reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and typical percentage error. Results Intrasession ICC statistics using 6 or more MEPs were >0.85 in the stroke group but intersession values were all <0.5. Reliability was best when measuring parameters from individual MEPs rather than averaged responses. Conclusions Reliability of intrasession MEP size is excellent in the lower limb of patients with stroke using as few as 6 MEPs but intersession reliability is poor. Significance Comparing MEP size measures across two or more sessions is questionable in the lower limb of patients with stroke.
dc.languageENG
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.029
dc.rightsCopyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in (see Citation). Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. The definitive version was published in (see Citation). The original publication is available at (see Publisher's Version).
dc.subjectLower limb
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulation
dc.titleReliability of Lower Limb Motor Evoked Potentials in Stroke and Healthy Populations: How Many Responses Are Needed?
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.029
pubs.elements-id157043


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record