AUT LibraryAUT
View Item 
  •   Open Research
  • AUT Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Clinical Sciences
  • View Item
  •   Open Research
  • AUT Faculties
  • Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences
  • School of Clinical Sciences
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST): Test-retest Reliability in a Community Adult Sample

Shaikh, N; Tokhi, Y; Hardaker, N; Henshall, K; Forch, K; Fernando, K; King, D; Fulcher, M; Jewell, S; Bastos-Gottgtroy, R; Hume, P; Theadom, A
Thumbnail
View/Open
Journal article (312.1Kb)
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/10292/15467
Metadata
Show full metadata
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the test-retest reliability of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST), which was designed to support the initial assessment of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) across a variety of contexts, including primary and secondary care. DESIGN: Test-retest design over a 2-week period. SETTING: Community based. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight adults (aged 18-58 years) who had not experienced an mTBI within the last 5 years and completed the BIST on two different occasions. MEASURES: Participants were invited to complete the 15-item BIST symptom scale and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) online at two time-points (baseline and 2 weeks later). To account for large variations in mood affecting symptom reporting, change scores on the subscales of the DASS-21 were calculated, and outliers were removed from the analysis. RESULTS: The BIST total symptom score and subscale scores (physical-emotional, cognitive and vestibular) demonstrated moderate to good test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging between 0.51 and 0.83. There were no meaningful differences between symptom reporting on the total scale or subscales of the BIST between time1 and time2 at the p<0.05 level when calculated using related samples Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. CONCLUSION: The BIST showed evidence of good stability of symptom reporting within a non-injured, community adult sample. This increases confidence that changes observed in symptom reporting in an injured sample are related to actual symptom change rather than measurement error and supports the use of the symptom scale to monitor recovery over time. Further research is needed to explore reliability of the BIST within those aged <16 years.
Keywords
Neurological injury; Primary care; Rehabilitation medicine
Date
2022
Source
BMJ Open 2022;12:e057701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057701
Item Type
Journal Article
Publisher
BMJ Journals
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057701
Publisher's Version
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/8/e057701
Rights Statement
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library

 

 

Browse

Open ResearchTitlesAuthorsDateSchool of Clinical SciencesTitlesAuthorsDate

Alternative metrics

 

Statistics

For this itemFor all Open Research

Share

 
Follow @AUT_SC

Contact Us
  • Admin

Hosted by Tuwhera, an initiative of the Auckland University of Technology Library