The Rhetoric and the Reality: Curriculum Leadership in New Zealand Secondary Schools

aut.embargoNoen_NZ
aut.thirdpc.containsNoen_NZ
dc.contributor.advisorDeerness, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorLeishman, Christine Lindsay
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T22:31:51Z
dc.date.available2022-12-07T22:31:51Z
dc.date.copyright2022
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2022-12-07T19:35:35Z
dc.description.abstractThe past three decades have seen significant changes in the variety and nature of middle-level leadership positions in New Zealand secondary schools. As a result of these changes there are now a range of titles used to describe the roles of those who are directly responsible for departmental administration and management, as well as the instructional leadership of colleagues in subject areas. However, current research suggests there is a lack of consistent understanding as to what curriculum leadership entails and of the capabilities required to enact the leadership role. This research examines different understandings of the curriculum leader role in New Zealand secondary schools. It questions the extent to which the lived experiences and practices of those in departmental and curriculum leadership positions are shaping and being shaped by the perspectives of others, in both their own immediate organisational environment and by professional bodies and associations at a national level. In doing so, it explores a perceived disconnect between “professional literature” (Wellington, 2015, p.55) including material published by the New Zealand Ministry of Education, The Teaching Council of Aotearoa New Zealand, organisational job descriptions and actual leadership practice. Four key new insights emerged from this study. The first of these confirm the proposed disconnect between the theoretical perceptions of curriculum leadership held by policy makers and those who practice curriculum leadership in secondary school organisations. The second key finding is linked to the first and identifies an inconsistent understanding of the leadership capabilities required to effectively lead a curriculum team, as well as of the means for developing those competencies. Due to the complex and ambiguous nature of the curriculum leader role, the third insight identifies significant personal and professional challenges faced by curriculum leaders in reconciling the level of performative expectations with the time and resources available, their pedagogical expertise and their professional ability to enact leadership. The fourth finding reveals that in the absence of a nationally cohesive, professional leadership development pathway, appointment into curriculum leadership is a highly subjective process, based on one’s perceived educational expertise and capacity for leadership.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10292/15727
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherAuckland University of Technology
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.titleThe Rhetoric and the Reality: Curriculum Leadership in New Zealand Secondary Schoolsen_NZ
dc.typeThesisen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorAuckland University of Technology
thesis.degree.levelMasters Theses
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Educational Leadershipen_NZ
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LeishmanC.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
897 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections