Testing the Influence of Self-Generated Persuasion on Conspiratorial Thinking Among New Zealand Adults

Simple item page
aut.embargoNoen_NZ
aut.thirdpc.containsNoen_NZ
dc.contributor.advisorWood, Jay
dc.contributor.advisorLandhuis, Erik
dc.contributor.authorMon, Sina
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T22:55:43Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T22:55:43Z
dc.date.copyright2022
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2022-04-28T01:00:35Z
dc.description.abstractConspiracy theories are persuasive and influential. Given the risks associated with belief in unwarranted conspiracy theories, research has started to examine various interventions to prevent or correct conspiracy adherence. This research study extends previous literature focused on attenuating conspiracy adherence by testing a novel intervention tool of self-persuasion to attenuate conspiracy mentality. More specifically, this research examined if self-persuasion via an argument-generation task would effectively influence general conspiracy mentality and conspiratorial suspicions about COVID-19. In a mixed study design, 452 participants from New Zealand were recruited online via convenience sampling and randomly assigned into one of four experimental conditions. Participants were asked to generate arguments that were: pro-conspiracy, anti-conspiracy, pro-greenery, or anti-greenery. Contrary to all hypotheses, findings showed that engagement in a self-persuasion task did not effectively influence conspiracy mentality or conspiratorial suspicion about COVID-19. Interestingly, conspiracy mentality scores across all conditions significantly decreased after a delayed period. Additionally, after generating pro-conspiracy arguments, significantly more participants chose not to receive information about COVID-19 conspiracies. Furthermore, after controlling for participants’ intolerance of uncertainty or topic importance, there were no significant differences in conspiracy mentality scores or COVID-19 conspiracy suspicion scores across the experimental conditions. Despite the prior success of self-persuasion interventions, the present study findings do not support self-persuasion for attenuating conspiracy adherence. Possible explanations and study limitations are considered. The methodological and theoretical suggestions for future research to attenuate conspiracy thinking are discussed.en_NZ
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10292/15096
dc.language.isoenen_NZ
dc.publisherAuckland University of Technology
dc.rights.accessrightsOpenAccess
dc.subjectConspiracyen_NZ
dc.subjectSelf persuasionen_NZ
dc.subjectPsychologyen_NZ
dc.subjectTestingen_NZ
dc.subjectInfluenceen_NZ
dc.subjectSelfen_NZ
dc.subjectGenerateden_NZ
dc.subjectPersuasionen_NZ
dc.subjectConspiratorialen_NZ
dc.subjectThinkingen_NZ
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_NZ
dc.subjectAdultsen_NZ
dc.subjectTheoryen_NZ
dc.subjectMixed studyen_NZ
dc.subjectCMQen_NZ
dc.subjectFICSen_NZ
dc.subjectIUSen_NZ
dc.subjectConspiracy mentalityen_NZ
dc.subjectCoviden_NZ
dc.titleTesting the Influence of Self-Generated Persuasion on Conspiratorial Thinking Among New Zealand Adultsen_NZ
dc.typeThesisen_NZ
thesis.degree.grantorAuckland University of Technology
thesis.degree.levelMasters Theses
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts in Psychologyen_NZ
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MonS.pdf
Size:
1015.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
897 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Masters Theses